Casino (1995) - Full Cast & Crew - IMDb

casino robert de niro cast

casino robert de niro cast - win

[US] Casino (1995) Martin Scorsese directs this tale of a mafia enforcer and a casino executive competing against each other over a gambling empire, and over a fast living and fast loving socialite. With an all star cast including Robert De Niro, Sharon Stone, and Joe Pesci.

submitted by Sabnitron to NetflixBestOf [link] [comments]

Casino [Cast: Robert De Niro, Sharon Stone, Joe Pesci] [Director:Scorsese]

submitted by bossmatical to NetflixBestOfCanada [link] [comments]

Review of Martin Scorsese’s 1995 Casino [A mob movie that has many actors that will go on to be in the Sopranos].

mods please lmk if this violates the rules. i’m posting here because I write about the mob/casino and many relevant themes that are important elements of the Sopranos, in my opinion. I think they’re of the same medium and genre so wanted to post here. Hope that’s alright. Cheers! (11 min read) ————————————————————————
EDIT 2: TL;DR -
Casino is a story of sexual and financial intrigue, mob violence, union pension fund embezzlement, a “love” story, and the protagonist's masochist addiction to the pain and chaos his lover inflicts on him. It turns out that the sharp-minded genius who meticulously runs the casino, is no more rational than the gamblers who routinely frequent the casino, coming back to lose their money and hoping that the odds will magically shift in their favor.
———————-
Every good filmmaker makes the same movie over and over again—Martin Scorsese is no different
Scorsese's Casino is a phenomenal story of the condoned chaos and "legalized robbery" that happens on a daily basis to gamblers who bett away thousands of dollars and return each day for more “FinDom,” but without any of the sexual sadism. The whole scam only persists because the house always wins: the odds are stacked 3 million to one on the slot machines, but the same shmucks return wide-eyed each day hoping for a different outcome, devoid of any rational re-evaluation required to maintain their grasp on reality, and the liquidity of their bank accounts.
Casino is a story of sexual and financial intrigue, mob violence, union pension fund embezzlement, a “love” story, and the protagonist's masochist addiction to the pain and chaos his lover inflicts on him. It turns out that the sharp-minded genius who meticulously runs the casino, is no more rational than the gamblers who routinely frequent the casino, coming back to lose their money and hoping that the odds will magically shift in their favor.
Robert De Niro plays Sam "Ace" Rothstein, recruited by his childhood friend Nick "Nicky" Santorno to help run the Tangiers casino, which is funded by an investment made with the Teamsters’ pension fund. Ace’s job is to keep the bottom line flowing so that the Mafia's skimming operation can continue seamlessly. De Niro's character felt like half-way between Travis from Taxi Driver (of course, nowhere as mentally disturbed) and half of the addictive excess, greed, and eccentric business-mind of Jordan Belfort in The Wolf of Wall Street.
Ace’s attention to detail gives him a rain-man-esque sensibility; his ability to see every scam, trick, hand signal, and maneuver happening on the casino floor make him the perfect manager of the casino, and take his managerial style to authoritarian heights in his pursuit of order and control over what is an inherently unstable and dynamic scheme; betting, hedging outcomes, and walking the line to keep the money flowing and the gamblers coming back. I’m not claiming Ace is autistic, I'm no clinician, but his managerial sensibilities over the daily operations of the casino, from the dealers to the pit bosses, to the shift managers, are to the point of disturbing precision, he has eyes everywhere, and knows how to remove belligerent customers with class and professionalism, but ultimately is short sighted in “reading” the human beings he is in relationship with. Ace is frustratingly naive and gullible in his partnership with Nicky and the threat he poses to him, and in his marriage with Ginger.
Ace has no personal aspirations to extract millions of dollars for himself out of the casino corruption venture. Ace simply wants the casino to operate as efficiently as possible, and he has no qualms about being a pawn of the bosses. While Sam, “the Golden Jew”—as he is called—is the real CEO of the whole enterprise, directing things at Tangiers for the benefit of the bosses “back home.” Ace’s compliance is juxtaposed with Nicky’s outrage upon feeling used: he gripes about how he is in “the trenches” while the bosses sit back and do nothing. Note that none of the activity Nicky engages in outside of the casino—doing the work of “taking Las Vegas over”—is authorized by the bosses. Ultimately Nicky’s inability to exert control over his crew and the street lead to his demise.
In the end, capitalism, and all that happens in the confines of the casino, is nothing but “organized violence.” Sound familiar? The mob has a capitalist structure in its organization and hierarchy: muscle men collect and send money back to the bosses who do not labor tirelessly “in the trenches.” The labor of the collectors is exploited to create the profits of their bosses. The entire business-model of the Mafia is predicated on usury and debtors defaulting on loans for which the repayment is only guaranteed by the threat of violence. But this dynamic is not without its internal contradictions and tensions, as seen in Casino.
In a comedic turn, the skimmers get skimmed! The bosses begin to notice the thinning of the envelopes and lighter and lighter suitcases being brought from the casino to Kansas City, “back home”. The situation continues to spin out of control, but a mid-tier mafioso articulates the careful balance required for the skimming operation to carry on: to keep the skimming operation functioning, the skimmers need to be kept loyal and happy. It’s a price the bosses have to pay to maintain the operation, “leakage” in their terms. Ace’s efficient management and precision in maintaining order within Tangiers is crucial for the money to keep flowing. But Ace’s control over the casino slips more and more as the movie progresses. We see this as the direct result of Nicky’s ascendance as mob kingpin in Vegas, the chaos he creates cannot be contained and disrupts the profits and delicate dynamics that keep the scam running.
Of course I can’t help myself here! We should view Scorsese’s discography, and the many portrayals of capitalist excess not as celebratory fetishization, but a critique of the greed and violence he so masterfully captures on film. See the Wolf of Wall Street for its tale of money as the most dangerous drug of them all, and the alienation—social and political—showcased in Taxi Driver. Scorsese uses the mob as a foil to the casino to attack the supposed monopoly the casino holds on legitimate, legal economic activity that rests on institutionalized theft. When juxtaposed with the logic of organized crime, we begin to see that the two—Ace and Nick—are not so different after all.
The only dividing line between the casino and organized crime is the law. Vegas is a lawless town yes, “the Wild West” as Nicky puts it, but there are laws in Vegas. The corruption of the political establishment and ruling elites is demonstrated when they pressure Ace to re-hire an incompetent employee who he fired for his complicity in a cheating scam or his stupidity in letting the slot machines get rigged; nepotism breeds mediocrity. In the end, Ace’s fall is the result of the rent-seeking behavior that the Vegas ruling class wields to influence the gaming board to not even permit Ace a fair hearing for his gaming license, which would’ve given him the lawful authority to officially run Tangiers. The elites use the political apparatus of the State to resist the new gang in town, the warring faction of mob-affiliated casino capitalists. While the mob’s only weapon to employ is that of violence. The mafia is still subservient to the powers that be within the political and economic establishment of Vegas, and they’re told “this is not your town.”
I’d like to make the most salient claim of this entire review now. Casino is a western film. The frontier of the Wild West is Vegas in this case, where the disorder of the mob wreaks havoc on, an until then, an “untapped market.” The investment scheme that the Teamsters pension fund is exploited for as seed capital, is an attempt to remain in the confines of the law while extracting as much value as possible through illegal and corrupt means for the capitalist class of the mob (and the ultimately dispensable union president). Tangiers exists in the liminal space of condoned economic activity as a legal and otherwise standard casino. While the violence required to maintain the operation, corrupts the legal legitimacy it never fully enjoyed from the beginning. This mirrors the bounty economy of the West and the out-sourcing of the law and the execution of the law, to bounty hunters. There is no real authority out in the frontier, the killer outlaw on the run is not so different from the bounty hunter who enjoys his livelihood by hunting down the killers. Yet, he himself is not the State. The wide-lens frame of Ace and Nicky meeting in the desert felt like a direct homage to the iconic image of the Western standoff. The conflict between Ace and Nick, the enforcer and the mastermind, is an approximation of the conflicts we might see in John Wayne’s films. The casino venture itself could be seen as an analogy of the frontier-venturism of railroad pioneers going to lay track to develop the West into a more industrial region.
I would have believed that this was a documentary about how the mob took over control of the Vegas casinos in the 1970-80s … if it were not for the viewer being expected to believe that Robert De Niro could play a Jew; it's hard to believe a man with that accent and the roles he’s played his entire career could be a “CRAZY JEW FUCK!!” I kid! But alas, De Niro is a class act and the last of the many greats of a bygone era. At times, it felt like Joe Pesci lacked talent as an actor, but his portrayal of the scummy, backstabbing bastard in Nicky was genuinely remarkable, but I might consider his performance the weak point of the movie. It’s weird to see a man that short, be that much of physical menace. There are a number of Sopranos actors in Casino. I’m sure Vincent Chase watched the movie and said to himself, “bet, i’ll cast half of these guys.”The set design and costumes were gorgeous. The styles and fashion of the time were spectacular. Scorsese’s signature gratuitous violence featured prominently, but tastefully. The camera work, tracking shots through the casino and spatial movement was incredible and I thought the cinematography was outstanding, the Western-esque wide lens in the desert was worthy of being a framed still.
The Nicky//Ace dynamic is excellent and the two play off of each other well. The conflict between the two of them escalates gradually, and then Nicky’s betrayal of Ace by cheating with Ginger marks the final break between the two of them. Nicky’s mob faculties represent a brutal, violent theft that is illegal and requires the enforcement of violence by organized crime. Despite the illegal embezzlement and corruption at play with the “skimming” operation at work at the casino, the general business model of the casino stands in contrast to the obscene violence of the loan sharks. Ace operates an intelligent operation of theft through the casino, and his hands-on management approach is instrumental to the success of the casino. Nicky’s chaos pervades the casino, and the life and activities of “the street” begin to bleed into Ace’s ability to maintain order in the casino. “Connected” types begin frequenting the casino, and Ace unknowingly forces one particularly rude gambler to leave the casino, who happens to have mob ties with Nicky. The “organized violence” of the casino cannot stay intact perfectly, because the very thing holding it together is the presence of the mob. Nicky is in Vegas as the enforcer and tasked with protecting Ace but his independent, entrepreneurial (shall we call them?) aspirations lead him to attempt to overtake what he realizes is a frontier for organized crime to brutalize and exploit the characters of “the street” (pimps, players, addicts, dealers, and prostitutes) and the owners of small private businesses.
Nicky is reckless, “when i plant my flag out here you won’t need your [casino/gaming] license” Nicky thinks he, and Ace, can bypass the regulations and bureaucratic legal measures by sheer force of violence alone. But ultimately Nicky is shortsighted and doesn’t have a real attachment to the success of the casino. After all, he isn’t getting profits from it (or much anyway) and isn’t permitted to play a real, active role in its daily functions because of his belligerent, untamed personality. Nicky has no buy-in that would motivate him to follow the rules or to work within the legal parts of the economy, it’s not the game he knows how to play, and win. All that he is loyal to, or deferent too, is the bosses back home; for whom he maintains absolute, uncompromising loyalty to, but still holds intense spite for.
And now to the more compelling element of the narrative. Sam “Ace” Rothstein is positioned as remarkably intelligent, he makes informed decisions that aid in his skill as a gambler, he can read people to determine whether he’s being conned, he has an attention to detail—aided by the casino’s surveillance apparatus which monitors cheating—that is almost unbelievable. Ace knows when he’s being cheated, he knows how to rig the game so that the house always wins, enacting psychological warfare to break down the confidence of would be proficient gamblers, who could threaten Tangiers’ bottom line. But in the end, the greatest gamble Ace makes is his marriage to Ginger. Ginger is the seductive, charismatic, and flirtatious madame who makes her money with tricks and her sexual power. Ginger works as a prostitute, seducing men, and extracting everything she can, almost as a sort of sexual-financial vampirism.
Ginger is the bad bet Ace can’t stop making even when she destroys his life, her own, and puts their daughter Amy in harm’s way. Ginger is the gamble Ace made wrong, but he keeps going back to her every time, trying to rationalize how she might change and be different the next time. Ace is not a victim to Ginger’s antics. Ginger makes it clear who she is: an addict, alcoholic, manic shopaholic who will use all of her powers to extract everything she can from everyone around her. She uses everyone to her advantage and manipulates men with her sexual power in exchange for their money and protection. Ginger had a price for her hand in marriage: $1 million in cash and $1 million worth of jewelry that are left to her and her alone as a sort of emergency fund.
Ace’s numerous attempts to buy Ginger’s love—and the clear fact that no matter how expensive the fur coat and how grand the mansion, none of it would ever be enough to satisfy her—mirrored Jordan Belfort’s relationship with Naomi in The Wolf of Wall Street. Both relationships carried the same manic volatility and conflict over child custody was found in both films, with the roles reversed in the respective films. Ginger may be irredeemable and a pathological liar, but Ace can’t claim that she wasn’t clear with him; when he asked her to marry him, Ginger said she didn’t love Ace. Ace replied that love could be “developed” but required a foundation of trust to develop. That trust was never there to begin with. The love was doomed from the start to destroy the two of them; two addicts, two gamblers, lying on a daily basis to one another and themselves about reality to justify their respective existences, the marriage, and Ace’s livelihood. And as Ginger pointed out, “I should have never married him. He’s a gemini, a triple gemini … a snake” Maybe astrology has some truth to it after all.
Now I’m not licensed (but hey neither was Ace, and he ran a casino empire!), but Ginger has the inklings of a borderline personality: her manic depression, narcissism, drug and alcohol abuse, and constant begging for forgiveness all seem indications of a larger psychological disorder at play. In the end, Ginger runs away with all the money Ace left her and finds her people in Los Angeles, the pimps, whores, and addicts she fits in with, in turn exploit and kill her for 3 grand in mint coins by giving her a ‘hot’ dose.
Overall, Casino is an incredible cinematic experience. I highly recommend watching this and seeing it as part of Scorsese's anthology of commentary on our economic system and its human victims. I’d argue that Casino, Wolf of Wall Street, and The Irishman all fit together nicely into a trilogy of the Scorsesean history of finance and corruption from the 70s to the 90s.
————-
EDIT 2: TL;DR —
Casino is a story of sexual and financial intrigue, mob violence, union pension fund embezzlement, a “love” story, and the protagonist's masochist addiction to the pain and chaos his lover inflicts on him. It turns out that the sharp-minded genius who meticulously runs the casino, is no more rational than the gamblers who routinely frequent the casino, coming back to lose their money and hoping that the odds will magically shift in their favor.
submitted by chaaarliee201 to thesopranos [link] [comments]

A Cinematic Guide to The Weeknd: Pt 3. My Dear Melancholy and After Hours

A Cinematic Guide to The Weeknd: Pt 3. My Dear Melancholy and After Hours

My Dear Melancholy

Gaspar Noe/Cannes Film Festival
The My Dear Melancholy era notable for being a time when The Weeknd was in proximity to a lot of serious directors. While he’s had a foot in Hollywood for awhile, 2017 through 2019 he was actively engaging with filmmakers like the Safdies Brothers, Gaspar Noe, and Claire Denis, amongst others. While he had been actively courting the Safdies since Good Time was released, he attended the 2018 Cannes Film Festival where he crossed paths Noe, whose film Climax took home a number awards at Cannes. Noe’s Enter the Void had previously served as an inspiration for Kiss Land, and for MDM (and later After Hours) seem to call back to Noe’s other films, like Irreversible and Love, which are both twisted depictions of heartbreak. On the other hand, Climax is about a French dance troupe who accidentally take LSD, and according to Noe is not a “message” movie. It is an audacious psychedelic technical exercise, with numerous long takes and highly choreographed set pieces. The idea for Noe, who had previously captured the feeling of drugs in previous films, was to do the opposite, and present the objectively reality of drugs, watching people high from a sober perspective.
Noe is a rather strong advocate of film, and the opening scene of Climax features VHS boxes of a number of films that have influenced his filmmaking. Two of note are Schizophrenia, otherwise known as Angst, one of Noe’s favorite films which The Weeknd name checked to the Safdies, and Possession, which would go on to be an influence on After Hours (more on this later). He is also said to have sat next to Benicio Del Toro at Cannes, which means he likely caught some of the Un Certain Regard section, where Del Toro served as a jury member. Outside of that section, there were a few other films of interest such as The House That Jack Built from Lars Von Trier (The Weeknd has previously expressed affection for Von Trier’s Antichrist), Mandy from Pastos Costamos, and music video director Romain Gavras’s The World Is Yours, as well as a restoration of 2001: A Space Odyssey, which Noe has referred to as the film that got him into filmmaking.
https://preview.redd.it/qga7a3l8ct261.png?width=910&format=png&auto=webp&s=371cf20d42ee8783cc23bfe7f2cfa16a0a927a0e
Asian Cinema
Later in 2018, The Weeknd continued his globetrotting with a tour of Asia. He once claimed in an interview that whenever visiting a foreign country he only watches films from there. I’ve previously written about the influence of Asian cinema on Kiss Land, and there’s not enough work from the MDM era to glean anything cinematically adjacent to this, but now would be a good time to mention that the "Call Out My Name" video was heavily inspired by the work of famed Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto. The Asian tour poster seems to be a reference to Ichi the Killer, which leads us to Takashi Miike. Though he is notoriously prolific across a number of genres, his most popular works internationally are genre melding blends of horror, comedy and crime, most notably Audition, Ichi the Killer and Gozu. Another film worth mentioning is Perfect Blue, Satoshi Kon’s masterwork about a pop star’s mysterious stalker that The Weeknd posted about on Instagram before. Bloody and haunting, the film was a major influence on Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan and Requiem for a Dream. In Interviews he has also mentioned a number of Korean films, such as The Wailing, I Saw the Devil and Oldboy. While Wong Kar Wai was previously mentioned as an influence on Beauty Behind the Madness, also worth mentioning is the work of John Woo, specifically A Better Tomorrow, well known for the shot of smoking a cigar off money, and Infernal Affairs, Andrew Lau’s crime classic which served has the basis for Scorsese’s The Departed.
https://preview.redd.it/fx7o9s2bct261.png?width=642&format=png&auto=webp&s=0fec2f841e9d3b09104238d0f89595daa6140faa
https://preview.redd.it/n4x7fiy9ct261.png?width=1316&format=png&auto=webp&s=8a9650263272518216fc5f36913e80a10d2b0a8e

After Hours

Martin Scorsese
While After Hours more so than any other Weeknd album is bursting at the seams with cinematic references, the influence of Martin Scorsese stands above all. Similar to The Weeknd’s body of work, many Scorsese’s are explorations of violence and masculinity, investigating them from a perspective that depending on who you ask (and how they’re feeling) glamorizes, condemns or just simply presents the reality of characters on the fringes of society.
While there are direct references to a number of prominent Scorsese films, what’s interesting is that his influence also reverberates in other films/filmmakers that influence After Hours. Todd Phillips’s Joker is in effect an homage to Scorsese’s loner-centric New York films, and the Safdie Brothers have been putting their own millennial spin on the type of 70s gritty thriller that Scorsese trafficked in (Scorsese was also a producer on Uncut Gems). Specific Scorsese works will be discussed more in depth in the requisite sections, but it is worth mentioning upfront what a prominent role that Scorsese plays in the nucleus of After Hours.
https://preview.redd.it/wcds9qpdct261.png?width=1196&format=png&auto=webp&s=246c560c72340782e26ad03b8ff63367999eaadd
Urban HorroIsolation
With After Hours, The Weeknd departs from the slicker sounds and influences that permeated Starboy and returns to the cinematic grittiness of Beauty Behind the Madness. While urban horror is a theme that permeates throughout The Weeknd as a project overall, there is a thorough line to be drawn here that follows a number of 70s and 80s cinematic and aesthetic references. For one thing, while the initial bandaged nose was a reference to Chinatown (previously, The Weeknd has a Kiss Land demo titled "Roman Polanski"), the full bandaged face that is so prominently featured throughout the After Hours era is a classic cinematic visual trope that was especially prominent throughout 60s and 80s, though it saw a slight re-emergence in the 2010s. The fully bandaged face is often used to remake someone in the image of another, usually against their will (The Skin I Live In, Eyes Without Face), or as a case of mistaken identity and doppelgängers (Good Night Mommy, Scalpel), themes present throughout much of After Hours. The "Too Late" video acknowledges these references, but instead presents the bandages on two Los Angeles models recovering from plastic surgery, in a nod to a famous Steven Meisel’s photoshoot for Vogue Italia.
https://preview.redd.it/dtbxjc3ict261.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=66a98cc3cba73d502f8586a215a65cc41c5408a1
The “masks” people wear is another horror trope that is featured prominently on After Hours, and this is best seen in the red suit character. One important reference in the film is to Brian De Palma’s Dressed To Kill, where a serial killer is targeting the patients of a psychiatrist (any more on this film will veer towards spoiler territory). The Weeknd is on the record as saying Jim Carrey’s The Mask as being a large influence on the Red Suit character, it being one of the first film’s he watched in theaters. One of the more complex references would be to Joker. While it sort of an in-joke that the character of the Joker is commonly overanalyzed and misinterpreted, referencing Todd Phillips’s Joker is more nuanced because it is in essence a full on homage to Martin Scorsese’s New York films, most notably Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy, which focus on eccentric loners, and can both be seen as cautionary tale of urban isolation, a theme explored perhaps in songs like "Faith." The King of Comedy revolves around a would be obsessive stand up Rupert Pupkin haggling his way to perform on late night TV, with The Weeknd’s talk show appearances being a prominent part of the early After Hours marketing, most notably in the “short film”. This idea of isolated and compressed urbanites recurs throughout After Hours and it’s films.
https://preview.redd.it/egap17ttdt261.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=1aab204ac0845a7df74ceeff6d1f714274f9ace0
The idea of urban repression is in the subway scene of the After Hours short film. The entire film itself is something of a reference to the subway scene to Possession (another Gaspar Noe favorite), mimicking the (also subway set) scene in which Isabelle Adjani’s Anna convulses on the subway due to a miscarriage, as well as Jacob’s Ladder, a 90s cult classic horror film starring Tim Robbins as a Vietnam vet (like Taxi Driver’s Travis Bickle) who is experiencing demonic hallucinations, encountering them in the subway and later at a party he attends, splitting the scene into two.
https://preview.redd.it/g53copgmct261.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d29e368ae695d295b36039e86125ccfd7b4eb88
Las Vegas
As always, The Weeknd once again grounds After Hours with a strong sense of place, this time setting the album against a nocturnal odyssey through Las Vegas. One of the most prominent films is Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Terry Gilliam’s adaptation of Hunter S. Thompson’s book. This is directly referenced in the "Heartless" video, which sees The Weeknd and Metro Boomin in the Johnny Depp and Benicio Del Toro roles as they tumble through a Las Vegas casino. The Weeknd has gone on the record to state that the famous red suit character was influenced by Sammy Davis Jr.’s character in the film Poor Devil. However, similar red suit has also been sported by a number of Vegas characters, most notably Richard Pryor and Robert De Niro’s Sam Rothstein in Martin Scorsese’s Casino. With the red suit, The Weeknd seems to be playing with the idea of a devil-ish other, another side of his personality that emerges in Las Vegas.
https://preview.redd.it/gjow6hq2dt261.png?width=1992&format=png&auto=webp&s=10a379bc26df54af88064bf64813d5cdd29775d9
While the city lights are the oft discussed part of part of Las Vegas, it should be noted that similar to Beauty Behind the Madness, the desert that surrounds Las Vegas is just as important to the juxtaposition of its beauty. The "Until I Bleed Out" video ends/"Snowchild" video in the desert, similar to the confrontation between Robert De Niro’s and Joe Pesci’s showdown in the desert in Casino, as well as Joe Pesci's death in Goodfellas. The idea of a hedonistic desert playground also bears semblance to Westworld, both the film and the TV show. The desert seems to represent some sort of freedom to The Weeknd, as the "Snowchild" video portrays the desert as a pensive location for reflection, as well as the "In Your Eyes" video showing the girl prominently dancing with the dismembered head out in the open, in reference to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, another prominent desert film.
https://preview.redd.it/98ec10wxct261.png?width=1168&format=png&auto=webp&s=45e29aa361fa41ff74e2a6017e203015bdcbc6c3
New York/The Safdies
Despite it’s Las Vegas setting, After Hours also takes a good amount from films set in New York, most notably Martin Scorsese’s 1983 film After Hours. Besides the title, After Hours is similarly about a twisting and turning nighttime odyssey. The film stars Griffin Dunne as Paul, a working class stiff who heads downtown to rendezvous with a woman he met at a diner earlier that night. Of course, things don’t turn out the way they should, chaos ensues, and Paul is set on a dangerous trek back uptown. Like the film, the album After Hours is set off by a woman (though the album takes more stock in romantic endeavors), seems to be set over a single night (or at least a condensed period of time), and involves similar chaos and misadventures (sirens at night at the end of Faith). Tonally, After Hours the film is more comedic perhaps than After Hours the album, however The Weeknd is on the record as having said that "Heartless" and "Blinding Lights" placement on the album is intended to be somewhat comedic, reflecting exaggerated machismo and ecstasy, respectively (to comedic effect).
https://preview.redd.it/f3w7yz4pdt261.png?width=1346&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe7e4f003987fd843020a42a5b53f94092984267
Another of the most prominent filmmakers of After Hours are the Safdies, who featured The Weeknd in Uncut Gems. They also served as a link to Oneohtrix Point Never, who scored their last two films and later worked After Hours. I believe there are three major film tropes (not genres) that inspired After Hours, all of which the Safdies’s have engaged with. There is the one-long-night films, in which a character spends one-long-night on the run from whatever chaos and forces may be that they left in their path. This can be seen in the Good Time, as well as After Hours (the movie). Then, there is the descent-into-madness type, where a character slowly loses grip with reality and ends up in over their head (something like Scarface or Breaking Bad, but for our purposes Jacob’s Ladder can be categorized here as well), which the Safdies did with Uncut Gems. Lastly, but maybe most importantly, the Safdies also explored toxic romance (more on this later) in their less seen film Heaven Knows What, about two heroin addicts and the destructiveness their love brings out in each other, an idea that recurs throughout After Hours on songs like "Until I Bleed Out" and "Nothing Compares." A recurring song throughout Heaven Knows What is Isao Tomita’s synth version of Debussy’s "Claire De Lune", which is featured in some episodes of Memento Mori and bears some resemblance to the start of "Alone Again".
https://preview.redd.it/em255b5qdt261.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5226c9496d0ae5c14b6d6c05e16f5ea18678a9a
Obsession/Toxic Romance
While love and lust and the ups and downs with it have been a formative part of The Weeknd’s ideology and themes, I don’t think it would be remiss to say that After Hours is perhaps his most outwardly romantic album. Despite this, one of the major arcs of the album is toxicity that comes with it, which a number of already mentioned films deal with. While "In Your Eyes" is one of the more romantic and accessible songs on the album, a re-assessment of it Ala Sting’s “Every Breathe You Take” could frame it as lonely obsessing, such as Travis Bickle’s infatuation with Jodie Foster’s teenage prostitute Iris, Joker's fixation on Murray Franklin, Rupert Pupkin’s obsession with Jerry Langford. Casino also deals with toxic romance, another prominent theme in After Hours, best seen in the love triangle that forms between Sam, his partner Nicky and his wife Ginger, played by Joe Pesci and Sharon Stone respectively.
https://preview.redd.it/eq1ioijvdt261.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=f9e4b781ee60762ae767c4dbd92066357ebc24b0
In almost all of the After Hours’s video content, The Weeknd seems to constantly meet his demise at the hands of women. Another interesting reference that may be something of a reach is to Phantom Thread, Paul Thomas Anderson’s film about Reynolds Woodcock, a couture dressmaker loosely based on Cristobal Balenciaga and his muse Alma, played by Daniel Day Lewis and Vicky Krieps, respectively. The film delves into their dysfunctional relationship, with Woodcock berating her and Alma poisoning his tea to keep him dependent on her. One of the highpoint of the film is a New Years Eve Party that bears strong resemblance to the "Until I Bleed Out" video. While the balloons may just be a callback to his earlier work, there is something about the color grading/temperature and the production design of the "Until I Bleed Out" video (as well as parts of the "Blinding Lights" video) that made me immediately think of Phantom Thread. A similar relationship is seen in the German horror film Der Fan, which The Weeknd has mentioned in a recent interview. In Der Fan, a young girl Simone spends her days obsessing over popstar R, until she finally encounters him outside his studio. The film is similar to the aforementioned Takashi Miike’s Audition in its exploration of obsession and idealization. In the film, an older man puts up a fake casting call to search for the perfect girlfriend. While Audition explores these themes from an Eastern perspective of societal pressure, Der Fan explores it through a Western lens of pop idolization and idealization. Both films deal with the idea that despite outward appearances, the perfect partner does not exist, and anyone that claims to be (or has the expectations put on them) is not who they seem.
https://preview.redd.it/3m661q62et261.png?width=1342&format=png&auto=webp&s=c9377018cb53f67cf7ce95b24392afb471e4aec1
One film he has spoken at length about is Trouble Everyday, Claire Denis’s arthouse vampire movie. The film stars Vincent Gallo as Shane, a scientist who travels to Paris under the guise of his honeymoon to track down core, a woman who he was once obsessed with who has now become a vampire. Core is locked up in a basement but sometimes sneaks out to seduce and consume unwilling victims. This seems to be where some of the bloody face stuff comes from, but I believe it’s influence is a little more conceptual. To me, a good companion film to Trouble Everyday is American Psycho, which seems to also have been a thematic influence on After Hours. Both films concern idealized version of masculinity and femininity, both very sexual and physical, but hostile as well. American Psycho ends with Patrick Bateman confessing to the killing of a prostitute, but no one believe him. Trouble Everyday ends with Shane killing Core, but Shane is unable to arouse himself after that except through violence. Koji Wakamatsu, a former Yakuza turned prominent extreme Japanese filmmaker (and a major influence on Gaspar Noe) is quoted as saying “For me, violence, the body and sex are an integral part of life.” Despite being hollow, idealized impressions of the self, a vampire and as a banker (cold, seductive bloodsuckers = monsters), Patrick Bateman and Core represent the Frankenstein-ian relationship between sexuality and violence, which I believe is the main theme of After Hours. Truly, we hurt the ones we love.
https://preview.redd.it/zfllbd83et261.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=9c048ee98d86d7bbb9db67fa8302d34c36214c4f

Postscript

To cap things off, I would just like to illuminate some key takeaways. As a filmmaker myself, this has been an extremely helpful exercise in understanding other artists process and ideas.
Steeped in the history of the medium…
It’s clear that The Weeknd is not your typical “I’m influenced by cinema” artist but an extremely legit film buff with serious credentials. The Weeknd’s film taste leans towards 70s-00s genre works, mostly horror, drama and thriller, and is well versed in the classics but also has the nose to sniff out deeper cuts and obscurities. The mantra of “good artists borrow, great artists steal” works even better if not many people know where you’re stealing from! What is impressive to me is that he is not just versed in “mainstream” obscurities, but also serious deep cuts. Films like Possession and Phantom of the Paradise may not stick out to the average person on the street but are well known in most film circles. Films like Inland Empire and New Rose Hotel (Der Fan was especially impressive to me, it is one of my favorite films) however are not as well known and it is very impressive to me that he can come across films like that, and really get enough out of it to bring into his own work.
…is able to interpolate contemporary/mainstream films…
This perhaps is one of the most impressive aspects of his integration of film into The Weeknd’s work. It is very easy for film buffs to get lost within their own obscure taste, living in a world where everyone is an idiot for not knowing who Shinya Tsukamoto. Trilogy and Kiss Land had a lot of contemporary obscurities, like Stalker, David Lynch etc., well known but they still existed as artifacts, not of the time we live in. However, perhaps picking something from his work on Fifty Shades of Grey, of late he has kept his finger on the zeitgeist and anticipated/integrated what the filmmakers of today are doing, such as his work on Black Panther and Game of Thrones, general appreciation of Tarantino, the works of Nicolas Winding Refn in Starboy, and his use of the Joker and Uncut Gems on After Hours, both of which came out just a few months before the album. It feels Jackson-esque, and I believe this is one thing that will help him further in his quest for pop stardom.
…while also being fully in tune to the works of modern transgressive auteurs…
In addition to keeping up with the mainstream is in touch with, The Weeknd also makes it a point to seek out and learn from the cutting edge filmmakers of today. While the Safdies were always going to blow up, I don’t doubt that a Weeknd co-sign accelerated their rise. Gaspar Noe is one thing, Enter the Void and Irreversible exist as masterpieces of the mainstream obscurities I’ve been mentioning, but he really truly tries to understand the heart of Noe’s work, even going so far back as to understand Noe’s influences (I sincerely hope he is tuned in to the work of Koji Wakamatsu). But most of all, to be a fan of Claire Denis is one thing, but to seek her out and make her an offer that she ACCEPTED is absolutely astounding to me. Just spitballing but it would be like if Michael Jackson shot a music video with Rainer Werner Fassbinder (who I’d bet good money that The Weeknd was put on to by Noe). We can only PRAY that one day we will be blessed with a David Lynch Weeknd video.
---------------------------
…and that just about does it. Hope you enjoyed this and thanks for being patient with me. I got quite busy after the first two and had my own projects/work going that kept me occupied. As we’re still technically in the After Hours era, I also wanted to wait until a few more videos and interviews came out to aid me in my research.
I also wanted to find enough time to make the Letterboxd for this. I personally don’t love Letterboxd culture, I find the popular culture surrounding the site a bit snobbish and exclusive, but I’ve gotten a number of requests for one and you gotta give the people what they want. Throughout the list are a few films that he hasn’t mentioned but are some of my personal favorites and I believe Weeknd fans will like, I encourage you to accidentally stumble upon things on it. Don't overthink, just pick something and watch!
If you’d like to follow me further, you can find me on Instagram here, where I post about film reviews Letterboxd style. I prefer Instagram so that more average people see it instead of an echo chamber of film snobs. I am also a filmmaker myself, I just recently wrapped this short film and am currently in the process of putting together my next project.
The main reason I did this however, besides a general appreciation of The Weeknd’s work, was to put more people on to the beautiful art form that is cinema. One thing I learned from Scorsese is that one must be an advocate and truly champion your medium. I hope that this encourages to check out more interesting movies than they wouldn’t normally come across, and I hope this will inspire more people to create more as well, whether it be to write, make films, music, anything. If even one person picks up a pencil, a camera or a keyboard because of these posts, I will be satisfied.
Thanks all!
submitted by eve_salmon to TheWeeknd [link] [comments]

'The Irishman' Review Thread

Rotten Tomatoes: 100% (8.97 in average rating) with 41 reviews
Critics consensus: An epic gangster drama that earns its extended runtime, The Irishman finds Martin Scorsese revisiting familiar themes to poignant, funny, and profound effect.
Metacritic: 92/100 (23 critics) "must-see"
As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie.
De Niro’s always at his best in the context of a Scorsese-mandated tough-guy routine, and Frank Sheeran gives the actor his most satisfying lead role in years. Sheeran appears in virtually every scene, and the story belongs to his colorful worldview the entire time. He may be an aging man telling tall tales, but that puts him in the same category as the one behind the camera. Sheeran, however, lost touch with his world long before he left it. With “The Irishman,” Scorsese proves he’s more alive than ever.
-Eric Kohn, IndieWire: A
Despite the movie's many pleasures and Scorsese's redoubtable directorial finesse, the excessive length ultimately is a weakness. Attempts to build in social context during the Kennedy and Nixon years, at times intercutting news footage from the period, aren't substantial enough to add much in terms of texture. The connections drawn between politics and organized crime feel undernourished, and the movie works best when it remains tightly focused on the three central figures of Frank, Russell and Jimmy. Netflix should be commended for providing one of our most celebrated filmmakers the opportunity to revisit narrative turf adjacent to some of his best movies. But the feeling remains that the material would have been better served by losing an hour or more to run at standard feature length, or bulking up on supporting-character and plot detail to flesh out a series.
-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter
Martin Scorsese’s “The Irishman” is a coldly enthralling, long-form knockout — a majestic Mob epic with ice in its veins. It’s the film that, I think, a lot us wanted to see from Scorsese: a stately, ominous, suck-in-your-breath summing up, not just a drama but a reckoning, a vision of the criminal underworld that’s rippling with echoes of the director’s previous Mob films, but that also takes us someplace bold and new.
-Owen Gleiberman, Variety
And the big ticket world premiere at this festival is its opening-night film, The Irishman, a nearly three-and-a-half-hour gangster epic from New York’s own hero, Martin Scorsese. The Irishman is less literal about its meta moodiness than Pain & Glory is, but it still speaks disarmingly quiet volumes about what the autumn of life might mean for its creator.
-Richard Lawson, Vanity Fair
For much of its duration, The Irishman covers familiar ground but is slickly entertaining, if a little repetitive in the third hour. There’s an almost meta-maturity, as if Scorsese is also looking back on his own career, the film leaving us with a haunting reminder not to glamorise violent men and the wreckage they leave behind.
-Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian: 4/5
Ultimately, “The Irishman” is a major success for Scorsese—not only does it incorporate the best aspects of his past crime dramas and their thrilling energy, but it adds context to those films and wrestles with their legacy resonantly. In a way, “The Irishman” fills in the gaps between “Goodfellas” and “Casino” to tell the overall story of the mob’s rise and fall in postwar America, but it does so while anchored to one man’s story and morality. The law never catches up to Sheeran—not for the real damning stuff anyway— but as Scorsese demonstrates with profound solemnity, he cannot outrun his conscience.
-Joe Blessing, The Playlist: A
Nothing this misshapen ever flies—Scorsese once managed to make a movie called The Aviator that was similarly overburdened—yet his all-over-the-place enthusiasm plays nicely against the material’s death stench. Tidy as it may be to expect, Scorsese doesn’t need to cap his career with a sign-off to the gangster epic; that would be way too sentimental for him. What The Irishman does become, in its final hour, is something better, a film about broken trust, to family and God. De Niro’s Sheeran, like the monks of Scorsese’s magnificent Silence, wrecked by spiritual compromise, can't express his pain. This may not be why the average fan comes to a Marty movie, but it’s the statement this director, now 76, feels like making. After so much brilliance, Scorsese is being too hard on himself (maybe this review is too), but when The Irishman is about doubt, it’s as personal as it gets.
-Joshua Rothkopf, Time Out: 4/5
People will want to see The Irishman because of De Niro, Pesci, and Pacino all in a mob movie again, directed by Martin Scorsese. And, boy, yes, that’s there. In the scenes where they are younger, the de-aging is … pretty good. I’d say the best I’ve seen so far. But it’s one of those things that if you stare at it, yes, you can see the imperfections – especially when De Niro or Pesci are acting alongside, say, a non-de-aged Ray Romano. But you do get used to it. And the way I look at this is, well, this is the small price to pay to get all these actors together again to tell this story. To star in Martin Scorsese’s phenomenal film about the price we all pay for our sins of youth … even if you or I didn’t kill Jimmy Hoffa. The Irishman is terrific and Netflix got their money’s worth.
-Mike Ryan, Uproxx
As much as they take special care to tell the audience that their characters are rotten to the core, Goodfellas and Casino and another spiritual relative, The Wolf Of Wall Street, have been misunderstood as glorifications; it’s an inevitable consequence, perhaps, of following ugly men with occasionally glamorous lives. Scorsese takes no such chances with The Irishman, a crime epic that pushes further forward in time than most, to a truly ignoble end. Eventually, it reminds us, we’re all just fitting ourselves for coffins.
-A. A. Dowd, Uproxx: A-
The film – at three hours and 19 minutes – never flags. The Irishman may not be as groundbreaking as Mean Streets or Taxi Driver, but then again, what is?
-Caryn James, BBC: 4/5
Scorsese is so adept at storytelling, and his cast is so unbelievable, that the film, which clocks in at 209 minutes — even longer than The Return of the King and Avengers: Endgame — barely feels its length. The Irishman feels more like being caught in a dream or reminiscence, with all the tenderness we’re willing to afford in those in-between hours. Only Scorsese and his assembled cast, not to mention longtime editor Thelma Schoonmaker, could bring that all into reality.
-Karen Han, Polygon
Some may balk at the 209-minute runtime, but there’s never a moment where this story drags. Indeed, the three-plus hours practically fly by, because we’re so swept up in this decades-long journey. There’s not a single second wasted here, because one gets the sense that all the characters are hanging on for dear life – literally. As the years tick on, and their bodies fail them, The Irishman‘s main players find themselves closer and closer to oblivion.
-Chris Evangelista, /FILM: 10/10
Five decades is a lot of history to hold together, and it could have easily crumbled. Remember “Gotti”? But Scorsese is at the top of his game here. His film is never boring, and it explores some unexpectedly deep themes for mafiosos.
-Johnny Oleksinski, New York Post: 4/4
With The Irishman, director Martin Scorsese proves to be in an alluringly funereal mood.
-Keith Uhlich, Slant: 3.5/4
There is no arguing that The Irishman is a masterpiece. It is Scorsese revisiting themes seen in his past work with new elements of excitement, despair, and wit. The great performances and incredible filmmaking make this fictionalized tale of Frank Sheeran a story to end the decade, one that has seen many changes within the film industry — and hopefully introducing a new era of Martin Scorsese.
-Shea Vassar, Filmera: 5/5
For the first two and a half hours of its three-and-a-half-hour runtime, The Irishman is clever and entertaining, to the point where you may think that’s all it’s going to be. But its last half-hour is deeply moving in a way that creeps up on you, and it’s then that you see what Scorsese was working toward all along.
-Stephanie Zacharek, TIME
A monument is a complicated thing. This one is big and solid — and also surprisingly, surpassingly delicate.
-A. O. Scott, The New York Times
Scorsese is probably the last big-budget filmmaker who mostly declines to tell the audience what to think, much less boldface and underline why he’s telling us a story about self-serving criminals and whether he personally condemns them. “The Irishman” doesn’t break with that tradition. The opportunity to sit with the movie later is the main reason to see it. For all its borderline-vaudevillian verbal humor and occasional eruptions of ultraviolence (often done in a single take, and shot from far away) it feels like as much of a collection of thought prompts and images of contemplation as Scorsese’s somber religious epics “The Last Temptation of Christ,” “Kundun” and “Silence.” God is as tight-lipped as Frank.
-Matt Zoller Seitz, RogerEbert.com: 3.5/4
DIRECTOR
Martin Scorsese
WRITER
Steven Zaillian
CINEMATOGRAPHY
Rodrigo Prieto
EDITOR
Thelma Schoonmaker
Release date:
November 1, 2019 (limited theatrical release)
November 27, 2019 (Netflix)
Budget:
$159,000,000
STARRING
submitted by SanderSo47 to movies [link] [comments]

Goodfellas turns 30 this year! Here are 40 interesting pieces of fact and trivia about the classic mob movie

You can check out a video version of this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OQkxioCNrw&t=3s
1 The first scene shot in the film was Morrie’s wig commercial, directed by Stephen R Pacca, who owned a window replacement company and directed and ran a similar ad in New York City that Scorsese was inspired by
2 When Jimmy is handing out money to everyone, Robert De Niro, ever the perfectionist, didn’t like how the fake money felt in is hands. He wanted real cash to be used, so the props master gave De Niro $5000 of his own money. No one was permitted to leave the set at the end of each take until the money was returned to the props man and counted.
3 Sticking with De Niro being a sticker for authenticity, according to the real-life Henry Hill, the protagonist of the movie, De Niro would phone him 7 or 8 times a day, wanting to discuss minute details of his character, even ow he would hold his cigarettes.
4 The classic Funny how scene is based on an occurrence which actually happened to Joe Pesci. When he was working in a restaurant years ago, he complimented a gangster by telling him he was funny, but the remark was met with a less than impressed response. Pesci told this to Scorsese, who implemented it into the film, and the scene was directed by Pesci himself and not included in the shooting script of the film, meaning his and Ray Liotta’s interactions would elicit genuine reactions from the supporting cast.
5 Henry Hill said that Joe Pesci’s portrayal of Tommy was 90 to 99% accurate. The only exception was that the real Tommy was a much larger and powerfully built man.
6 Veteran actor Al Pacino, who director Martin Scorsese wanted to work with for years and who he would later work with in The Irishman, was offered the role of Jimmy Conway. Pacino turned it down, for fear of being typecast as a gangster actor. He would go on to regret this decision.
7 Much has been made about real life mob involvement in the making of Goodfellas, from Robert De Niro attempting to contact the real-life Jimmy Burk, to Scorsese hiring background actors with real life mafia connections, such as Tony Sirico, who would later find fame playing Paulie Walnuts in The Sopranos. According to Nicholas Pileggi, author of the book Wiseuy upon which Goodfellas is based, there were several mobsters hired as extras in order to add authenticity to the film. They provided the studio with fake social security numbers, and as such it is unknown how they were paid.
8 Ray Liotta’s mother died whilst the movie was being filmed, and Liotta used his emotions over his mother’s death in his performance, most notably in the scene where he pistol whips another man.
9 When Joe Pesci’s mother saw the film, his real life mother, she liked it, but questioned her son if he had to swear so much. 5 years later in Casino Catherine Scorsese, who played Pesci’s mother in Goodfellas, complains to her son in Casino about swearing too much.
10 The painting of the two dogs and the man in the boat that Pesci’s mother in the film paints was actually painted by Nicholas Pileggi
11 The Lufthansa heist, which plays a major part of the movie, did not have its case solved and closed until 2014, and most of the surviving participants were arrested.
12 When Henry Kill is introducing mobsters to us in the bar, one of them is a character named Fat Andy. This character is played by Louis Eppolito, Eppolito was at the time a former NYPD detective whose father, uncle and cousin were in the mob. 15 years after the release of Goodfellas, Eppolito, along with his police partner, were arrested and charged with racketeering, obstruction of justice, extorsion, and up to 8 murders. They were both given life sentences, with an added 80 years each.
13 The F word and its derivatives are used 321 times in the film, at an average of 2.04 per minute, and almost half of them are said by Joe Pesci. At the time it was made, Goodfellas held the record for the most amount of profanity in a single film.
14 The scene where the three main characters eat with Tommy’s mother was almost completely improvised by the cast, including Tommy asking his mother if he could borrow a butcher’s knife and Jimmy’s remark about the animal’s hoof. Scorsese did not tell his mother tat Pesci’s character had just violently beaten a man, only that he was home for dinner and that she was to cook for them.
15 The real life Jimmy, along with Paulie whose death is mentioned in the film, also died in prison in 1996. He would have been eligible for parole in 2004.
16 Paul Sorvino wanted to drop out of the role as Paulie just three days before filming was schedule to start, as he felt he lack the cold personality to play the role correctly. After phoning his agent and asking him to release in from the film, his agent told him to think it over for a while. Later that night, Sorvino was practicing in the mirror and made a face that even frightened himself, and he was convinced that he would be able to play the role.
17 According to film legend, the real life Jimmy Burke was so trilled that Robert De Niro was playing him in the movie, that he phoned up De Niro from prison and gave him advice. This is something denied by Nicolas Pileggi
18 Even though Joe Pesci was in his fourties during the filming of Goodfellas, the real life inspiration for his character was in his 20 when the events of the film took place. Scorsese was initially concerned with Pesci being too old to play the role of Tommy, and Pesci sent him a video of him walking
19 Nicolas Pileggi spoke to Henry Hill throughout the script writing process, and he says much of the voice over narration in the film are almost exact quotes from Liotta himself
20 According to Debi Mazar, Henry Hill’s girlfriend in the film, when she trips after meeting Henry she actually tripped over the camera’s dolly track. Scorsese kept it in the film because it looked like her character was overwhelmed by Henry.
21 One of the daughters of Ray Liotta and Lorraine Bracco’s characters, the one too shy to give Paulie a kiss when he visits their home, is actually the daughter of Harvey Keitel, with whom Braco had the child.
22 In order to better get into character, when driving to and from the set Ray Liotta would often listen to tapes of interviews Pileggi had with the real Henry Hill. Liotta noted that Hill spoke casually of murders and other serious crimes whilst eating potato chips.
23 After seeing the film, Henry Hill thanked Liotta for not making him look like an asshole. Ray Liotta response was to think to himself “did you even watch the movie?”
24 The famous long take of the Copacabana took just 7 to 8 takes to get right
25 Henry Hill’s life after he went into the witness protection program was adapted into a movie released the same year as Goodfellas – called My Blue Heaven. Nicholas Pilei’s wife wrote the script for the film.
26 According to Scorsese, legendary actor Marlon Brando attempted to persuade him to not make the movie.
27 The real life Henry Hill was paid around half a million dollars for the movie.
28 Robert De Niro was offered the roles of both Jimmy and Tommy. He chose the former.
29 Despite it’s status as a classic, Goodfellas only won one Oscar. And its winner, Joe Pesci, was so surprised, that his winning speech was one of the shortest in Oscar history, simply saying, “it’s my privilege, thank you”
30 Frank Vincent, the man who plays Billy Batts and is beaten and stabbed to death by Joe Pesci, and who also starred with Pesci in two other Scorsese films – Ragin Bull and Casino - actually has a long history with Pesci. The two used to be bandmates and a comedy duo in the late 60s. They also starred in the low budget 1976 mafia film The Death Colelctor, where they were spotted by Robert De Niro and Martin Scorsese, and eventually hired for their roles in Raging Bull.
31 The producer’s original choices for the roles of Henry and Karen were Tom Cruise and Madonna.
32 Paul Sorvini improvised the slap that his character gives Henry in the scene where Paulie confronts Henry about drug dealing
33 In the original shooting script of the film, the Billy Batts shinebox scene was the very first scene in the film, followed by the dinner at Tommy’s mother’s house. Then Liotta would say the phrase “As far back as I can remember I always wanted to be a gangster” and the movie would show his youth and growing up.
34 Early screenings of Goodfellas were met with poor reception. According to Pileggi, one screening had around 70 people walk out, and in another the film’s team had to hide at a local bowling alley as a result of an audience angry at the film’s level of violence.
35 In spite of the film’s violent reputation, there are only 5 on screen deaths
36 When Spider is shot by Tommy, Michael Imperioli broke a glass in his hand and had to be rushed to hospital. But when he got there, the doctors attempted to treat his apparent gunshot wound. When the actor revealed what his real injury was, he was made to wait for 3 hours in the emergency room. Scorsese told Imperioli that he would tell this story one day on the tonight show with Jay Leno, a prediction which cam true in 2000.
37 US attorney Edward McDonald, the fed who explains the ins and outs of the witness protection programme to Henry Hill and his wife, is actually playing himself in this scene, re-enacting the conversation he had with the real Henry Hill. McDonald volunteered to play the role and won a screen test when Scorsese was location scouting his office as a possible filming location.
38 The movie ends with Henry in the witness protection program, but after the film’s release, as a result of violating his terms and conditions, including going around and telling people who he was, Henry Hill was thrown out of the programme.
39 Henry requests that he isn’t sent anywhere cold when g egos into the programme. In the ending of the film, he picks up a newspaper for Youngstown in Ohio, a place which has below freezing temperaturs in winter, suggesting that Henry’s wish was not granted.
40 The film’s ending, where Joe Pesci fires several bullets staring at the camera, is a homage to the landmark 1903 short film The Great Train Robbery, widely considered one of the first narrative pictures. Scorsese saw his movie as part of a tradition of outlaws in American pop culture and noted that, in spite of the fact tat the two films are separated by almost a century, according to the man himself, “they’re essentially the same story.”
submitted by CineRanter-YTchannel to flicks [link] [comments]

Megathread 2: Donald Trump Leaked Video and Campaign Statement; GOP Statements

Please find the original megathread linked here, this is a continuation and expansion in light of additional conversation and more news.
This thread is for discussion of the leaked 2005 video in which Donald Trump discussed women, his online statement/taped apology following that tonight, and reactions from GOP officials including but not limited to unendorsements.
Reminder that this thread is for on-topic and civil discussion. Please be nice, and discuss the issue at hand.

Submissions that may interest you

TITLE SUBMITTED BY:
Trump apologizes for vulgar comments about women recorded in 2005 popejiii
Donald Trump Apologizes For Lewd Comments Made In 2005 faradayyy
New York Daily News puts out stunning Saturday cover after lewd Donald Trump audio is leaked Fluffysniper
Trump plunged into crisis as GOP recoils from vulgar remarks catsdigme
Video of Pence Ignoring Reporter's Questions in Regards to Trump elDuderino775
Rep. Jason Chaffetz: "I'm out ... I can no longer endorse Donald Trump for president" coltsmetsfan614
Rep. Jason Chaffetz is the first sitting Republican member of Congress to pull his support of Donald Trump farooq2
Trump to release video statement after lewd 2005 comments surface Ven_ae
Top GOP lawmaker withdraws Trump endorsement Alejandro_Last_Name
Donald Trump Tried to Fire Nancy ODell After She Rejected His Sexual Advances ButGravityAlwaysWins
The 1997 Lawsuit Alleging Trump Groped a Woman Just as He Bragged About on Video bvlshewic
"Donald Trump: Groper-in-Chief" - NY Times scarface199
Chamber of Commerce aide: Trump should step down joe4942
Speaker Paul Ryan disinvites Trump to his campaign event, says he's 'sickened' by tape coffee_dude08
GOP senator: Trump should drop out. GonzoVeritas
RNC Officials Meeting to Discuss Options if Trump No Longer GOP Nominee: Report NeilPoonHandler
Donald Trump Tried to Fire Nancy ODell After She Rejected His Sexual Advances emr1028
Jon Huntsman And Other Republicans Call On Donald Trump To Drop Out Of The Race FeelTheJohnson1
Crisis Meeting Happening at Trump Tower Right Now ClosingDownSummer
Paul Ryan Bans Trump From Event JohnPoe
The Sleaziness of Donald Trump Sports-Nerd
Donald Trump Tried to Fire Nancy ODell After She Rejected His Sexual Advances Darjello
Donald Trump forced into apology over boasts of sexually preying on women ManiaforBeatles
Trump Says 'I Was Wrong' After Groping Comments Awards_from_Army
Coffman: Trump Should Step Aside And Do The Right Thing 19683dw
Republicans rush to condemn Trump and distance themselves after lewd video of Trump emerges billthomson
Trump to release video statement after lewd 2005 comments surface corleone21
Paul Ryan cancels Saturday appearance with Trump Cyyyyk
Paul Ryan Says Donald Trump Will No Longer Appear With Him In Wisconsin garyploski
Trump says Pence to represent him at Wisconsin event on Saturday hug_mee
Paul Ryan just let fly about Donald Trump StevenSanders90210
Paul Ryan, 'sickened' by comments, says Trump won't attend Wisconsin event ZimZimA1
Pence refuses to respond on Trump's comments peddelman42
Donald Trump apologizes for aggressive, crude comments FoChouteau
Washington GOP official: Trump's remarks made when he was a Dem Just_For_Da_Lulz
It Is Too Late For The GOP To Rid Itself Of The Trump Stench SandersCantWin
Prominent Evangelicals Still Backing Trump After Lewd Video dajesus77
Reid to GOP: Drop 'sociopath' Trump Dads_cream_soda
Trump: 'I Said It, I Was Wrong, And I Apologize.' qcubed3
Republican Rep. Barbara Comstock of Virginia urges Trump to drop out of race ThouHastLostAn8th
Trump in crisis after lewd remarks about women come to light hug_mee
Caller who had a tape of Donald Trump's lewd comments helped tip-off Washington Post reporter executivemonkey
Republican Senator Calls for Trump to Drop Out and for GOP to Begin 'Emergency Replacement' jcsf123
Analysis: Mark Kirk wants Donald Trump off ballot, but there's no way to remove him ainbheartach
Republican Senator Calls for Trump to Drop Out and for GOP to Begin 'Emergency Replacement' MatthewKBurke
Trumps unbounded vulgarity is exposed executivemonkey
Tape shows disgusting Donald Trump at his sexist, misogynist worst billthomson
Ryan sickened by Trumps lewd comments in video ioxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoi
Donald Trump, Groper in Chief chad1312
Clinton camp blasts Trump with leaked audio in new ad v-string
Speaker Ryan cancels Saturday event with Trump following vulgar video release ItsJustAJokeLol
Ryan 'sickened' by Trump comments, Trump no long coming to WI event hundes
'America deserves far better': Republicans react to crude comments from leaked Trump audio r4816
Billy Bush was already polarizing. His lewd Donald Trump conversation makes things much worse. sheshesheila
Donald Trump cant resist blaming Bill Clinton when his own sexism comes up KermitTheSnail
The many times Trump has been accused of harassing female employees AustiniteInExile
What Advice Is Roger Ailes Giving Donald Trump About His Sexual Assault Comments? AncillaryIssues
GOP lawmaker: Trump should 'step aside' for sake of party realstekcor
First Trump-Ryan appearance derailed by Trump tape johnybravo23
Donald Trump Disses J. Lo's ButtAnd More Misogynistic Comments From the GOP Leader jimrosenz
Donald Trumps apology for his leaked tape, deconstructed by an apology expert dajesus77
Hey ladies, at least we know what Donald Trump thinks of us helpmeredditimbored
The Latest: Utah Senator Mike Lee calls on Trump to quit after apology video TheModelPerson
The coming Trump vs. Clinton sex scandal showdown Plymouth03
Top Republicans rebuke Trump after lewd "Access Hollywood" tape released Mahaviak
Donald Trumps Apology That Wasnt yakinikutabehoudai
Donald Trump's Tape: Yep, He's Talking About Sexual Assault TWFH
Trump defiantly apologizes after lewd remarks about women revealed Ellinawest
GOP strategist Ana Navarro unleashed hellfire on CNN over Trump. It's must-see TV. angrybox1842
Chaffetz explains why he's pulling support for Trump ZmajLee
Ryan calls off plans to campaign with Trump; GOP-ers rush to distance themselves zlackins
Donald Trump sorry for obscene remarks on women - BBC News TheSutphin
Republicans blast Donald Trump over sexism, demand he steps down JeanJauresJr
It Is Too Late For The GOP To Rid Itself Of The Trump Stench the_hack_attack
Trump defiantly apologizes after lewd remarks about women revealed roman1212
Donald Trumps Apology That Wasnt trifecta
Donald Trump boasts of groping women CoolCapeMay
The GOPs brutal responses to the new Trump video, broken down LineNoise
Washington GOP chair: Trump's lewd remarks 'were made when he was a Democrat' coolcrosby
Paul Ryan condemns Trump's boasts of groping women HamsterSandwich
Who is Billy Bush: the man egging on Trump in tape about groping women HamsterSandwich
Donald Trump's Apology That Wasn't toekknow
[You Don't Need A Daughter To Know Trump Bragging About Sexual Assault Is Vile FatLadySingin
Let's Be Clear: Donald Trump Bragged About Sexual Assault DanielleMuscato
Donald Trump has self-immolated and he'll take the entire conservative movement down with him Trombosaurus
Donald Trump forced into apology as sex boast tape horrifies Republicans ihavesexwith
Trump now too toxic for Paul Ryan, Hill GOP zlackins
Trump's Words Are Not 'Explicit Sex Talk' RnqsgdqmIda
Donald Trump tape: People 'disgusted' at recordings where Republican talks about groping women aninoldies
3 big questions Donald Trump will have to answer about this lewd video wenchette
Donald Trump Apologizes In Recording That Looks Like A Hostage Tape m_richards
Billy Bush Says Hes Ashamed by Lewd Talk With Donald Trump DrDaniels
Donald Trump Apologizes In Recording That Looks Like A Hostage Tape Ellipsis83
Leading Republicans are furiously denouncing Trump for his leaked comments about women fuibanidoevoltei
Trump now too toxic for Paul Ryan, Hill GOP Ellipsis83
Donald Trump is directly contributing to rape culture movethebird
Republicans slam Trump -- but slow to pull endorsements alllie
How the shocking hot mic tape of Donald Trump was exposed Lifelove4u
GOP frantic as Clinton uses Trump vulgarity in new ad UvonTheDeplorable
Top Republicans rebuke Trump after lewd "Access Hollywood" tape released tomhanks23
Bill Maher Blasts Leaked Trump Tape: Making Sexual Assault Great Again Shitposter123456789
Second GOP lawmaker rescinds Trump endorsement Mapleyy
Trump says 'I was wrong and I apologize' calls to resign from GOP begin Ellipsis83
Even Trump boasting about sexual assault isnt getting Republican elites to dump him (so far) NeilPoonHandler
Why Donald Trump and Billy Bushs leaked conversation is so awful tk421yrntuaturpost
Trump's Legacy Will Haunt GOP Beyond 2016 Shitposter123456789
Third GOP senator calls on Trump to drop out OtroGatoGordo
Democratic super PAC launches ImWithSexist.com to shame GOP pols who back Trump Aidan_King
Our Live Elections Podcast Reacts To Donald Trumps Lewd Comments LP1236951
GOP Sen. Crapo Calls on Trump to Quit Race chad1312
Trump apologizes for video bragging about groping women Lifelove4u
Republicans distance selves from Trump, call for him to quit, after damaging video CoolCapeMay
The Latest: GOP Sen. Crapo Calls on Trump to Quit Race joshing_slocum
GOP senator unendorses Trump, urges him to leave ticket Forever_LEM
Corey Lewandowski Previews Trump Campaigns Defense of Lewd Tape j33
Carly Fiorina calls on GOP to replace Trump joe4942
Washington state GOP Chairman excuses Trumps remarks: He was channeling Bill Clinton nonstopflux
Paul Ryan, Reluctant Supporter, Weighs Response to Donald Trumps Remarks ainbheartach
GOP congressional candidates start to abandon Trump FatLadySingin
Trump dismisses GOP calls to quit race IsleCook
Top Evangelicals Stand By Trump After Crude Video Revelation 2_Sheds_Jackson
Lewd Donald Trump Tape Is a Breaking Point for Many in the G.O.P. HeinieKaboobler
US election: Donald Trump says he will not quit over video temporarycreature
Pence says he was 'offended' by Trump's remarks about groping women keldorr92
Pence: 'Cannot defend' Trump lewd remarks Robvicsd
Republicans who have condemned Trump. "Republicans who have called for Trump to be replaced as the GOP nominee." T1mac
AP: 'Apprentice' cast and crew say Trump was lewd and sexist BosomBosons
Robert De Niro goes off on Trump in new video Lifelove4u
Trump: 'Zero chance I'll quit' chohee
Amid growing calls to drop out, Trump vows to never withdraw mr_charliejacobs
Crapo, Ayotte pull support for Trump jumbleton
Crapo, Ayotte pull support for Trump mockassin
Trump answers calls to drop out of presidential race furqan651
Reports: Pence Won't Sub For Trump At Campaign Event With Paul Ryan Carmac
Trump's leaked comments aren't surprising. They fit a long pattern of abusive behavior. cyclopsrex
Millions of voters can respond almost immediately to what they hear from Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton in Sunday's presidential debate, or to the revelations about Trump's crude comments on tape about women. TwoGee
Pence says he was 'offended' by Trump's remarks about groping women Dracula_in_Auschwitz
Mike Pence 'Offended' By Donald Trump's Lewd Remarks About Women Sr_Laowai
The Latest: Pence won't "condone" or "defend" Trump remarks andrewdt10
Republicans shouldnt be demanding Trump apologize they should apologize for backing him homepregnancykit
No. 3 GOP Senate leader says Trump should withdraw mjfern
Lewd Trump Tape Is a Breaking Point for Many in the G.O.P. holierthanthee
Mike Pence: I do not condone his remarks and I cannot defend them Qwertysapiens
Pence Pulls Out of Paul Ryan's Wisconsin Event - ABC News demosthenes131
Republicans Get What They Deserve As Trump Vows Never Ever To Drop Out Of Race pheonix200
Pence will not attend Wisconsin GOP event Ellipsis83
Carly Fiorina calls on Donald Trump to step aside and Mike Pence to move to the top of the ticket JeanJauresJr
Donald Trump Just Lost The Election stumblybumble
Nevada GOP Senate candidate drops support for Trump polymute
Mike Pence: I 'Cannot Defend' Donald Trump's Lewd Remarks About Women neymargolas
Trump Tapes and Clinton Leaks: One of the Craziest Weeks American Politics Has Ever Seen mastermindxx
Chaos in GOP: Calls grow for Trump to drop out of race scite
Evangelical Leaders Shrug At Donald Trumps Lewd Comments myellabella
Leaked Trump video sparks heated exchange NMSSS
Donald Trumps video is exactly what we mean when we talk about rape culture delafayette
Donald Trump on Saturday morning broke his Twitter silence in the wake of damaging audio leaks showing him vulgarly talking about groping women. Certainly has been an interesting 24 hours! polymute
Pence says he cannot defend lewd remarks by Trump discocrisco
Pence cannot defend Trumps lewd comments about women LaughBerryCrunch
#NotOkay: Women react to Donald Trump video tomhanks23
Trump in 1993: Indians Shouldn't Get Casinos Unless They Look Indian to Me (Video) walter_neft
Donald Trump Made Lewd Comments While Melania Was Pregnant viccar0
Op-ed: Dr. Ben Carson on the Donald Trump video buy_iphone_7
submitted by PoliticsModeratorBot to politics [link] [comments]

What's Happening in CT 11/8 - 11/10

Friday, November 8th 2019:

Saturday, November 9th 2019:

Sunday, November 10th 2019:

Here's a link to more activities in CT!


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

How about see a newly released movie like these:
Doctor Sleep
Honey Boy
Last Christmas
Midway
Playing with Fire
Arctic Dogs
submitted by SheCalledMePaul to Connecticut [link] [comments]

Why not, another Irishman review, eh?

Martin Scorsese’s The Irishman is a movie that I wasn’t looking forward to. Despite Scorsese being my favorite living filmmaker, and his previous movie (2016’s Silence) being one of his best, the lead up press going into the production of this movie did not get me excited. There was much made about who was going to be in it: Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci coming back to collaborate with Scorsese for the first time since 1995’s Casino, Harvey Keitel coming back to Scorsese for their sixth movie together and the first since Last Temptation of Christ in 1988, Al Pacino working with Scorsese for the first time, Scorsese’s Gangs of New York co-writer Steve Zaillian writing the script from the book I Heard You Paint Houses by Charles Brandt. And a lot of talk of how this was Scorsese back with another mob movie, the genre he’s most associated with despite it only being about 5 out of 40 movies he’s made. It all had a feeling of “let’s get the band back together before we all die (De Niro is the youngest of the group, having just turned 76) despite us not being able to make great music anymore.” Scorsese has been doing great work his whole career but when was the last time De Niro was great? Jackie Brown, I guess? That was 1997. Pacino? He’s been all over the place the last couple decades and even when he’s been great the movies usually aren’t as good as him. And he’s been terrible in terrible movies as well. Pesci has been retired. I didn’t realize that Keitel wasn’t, I just haven’t seen him in a while. There were reports that the budget of the movie ballooned due to the de-aging technology Scorsese was employing to make the actors look younger (makeup wasn’t gonna cut it). The announced runtime was three and a half hours. The movie just had a cloud of “potential disaster” hanging over it to me. It was a weird feeling that everyone seemed to be excited about this project except for me, the big Scorsese fan. I just had a bad feeling about it.
I’m happy to say I was shown pretty quickly that I needn’t have worried. The 3.5 hours flies by in a really delightfully wonderful way. Scorsese, the one of the group with the best track record, was the one in charge here and he’s still at the top of his game even at the age of 77. The Irishman follows the career and life of Frank Sheeran (De Niro) as he gets involved with mobsters like Russell Bufalino (Pesci) and eventually with legendary Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa (Pacino). Sheeran becomes a confidant, driver, muscle, and hit man for both men. He also sometimes has to play peacemaker between the hot headed Hoffa, and the quieter, more controlled and diplomatic Russell. And although a lot happens plot wise, most of the movie hinges on those three actors acting those parts.
Pacino is right at home in the role of the loud mouthed Hoffa. Hoffa loved hamming it up and being the person everyone in the room had their eyes on. But even though Pacino has become known for his big outbursts and over the top performances, he’s always been more interesting in his quieter moments. He’s got both here. Hoffa lets down his guard around Frank, we see the firebrand out in public and the loving husband and father he was at home, and Pacino is infinitely watchable in all of his moments. It’s a terrific performance and definitely one of Pacino’s late career highlights.
Pesci was typically the one to take on the “wild card” role, whether it was Tommy in Goodfellas or Nicky in Casino, or even in non-Scorsese roles like My Cousin Vinny or Home Alone. He was the one with the twinkle in his eye that you didn’t know what he was gonna do and you couldn’t take your eyes off of him. Pesci’s role here is much more subdued but no less watchable. Pesci is magnetic and you can feel Russell’s power just from the looks he is giving and the carefully chosen words he says. It’s not the Pesci I expected to see and I’m very happy about that because he’s extraordinary here. His final scenes, where you can see the ravages of old age tearing down this powerful man, are heartbreaking and never because Pesci is pushing for that, he just embodies it and let’s us see. It’s my favorite of the performances in the movie.
De Niro shows that he simply hasn’t worked with the right people in the last 20+ years. He’s not had roles that were worthy of him and he’s seemed okay with that. Even with his collaborations with David O. Russell, I didn’t care for the performances that much. They weren’t bad, but De Niro’s Oscar nomination for Silver Linings Playbook felt more like a “congratulations on trying again, Bob” nod. But with Scorsese, working together for the ninth time, De Niro has a filmmaker who is not only worthy of him but pushes him into higher levels of genius. De Niro is one of the greatest actors we’ve ever been given, and although his work here isn’t up there with Godfather part 2, Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, or maybe even Goodfellas, it’s still great work. It’s just at a “one of the best of the year” levels of performance instead of his past “one of the best of all time” level. De Niro makes us believe the journey, even when some of the CGI de-aging looks a little weird. His ability to play the ruthless mob killer as well as the conflicted protector of two guys with two different ideologies as well as the broken old man just wanting to apologize to his daughters for being a shitty dad is really astounding when you think about it. And Scorsese lets the camera linger a lot on De Niro’s face, which tells so much of Frank’s inner journey that goes unsaid with dialog. Scorsese trusts De Niro and trusts that the audience understands and cares about this guy.
The rest of the supporting cast is littered with terrific actors, characters, and performances as well. Ray Romano as Russell’s lawyer, Jesse Plemons as Hoffa’s son, Keitel as a mob boss (though he’s hardly in the movie, which surprised me given his history with Scorsese, he’s only got a couple of lines), Stephen Graham as a rival mob boss named Tony Pro, and others. My favorite of the bunch might’ve actually been Anna Paquin as Sheeran’s daughter who seems to always be watching him. Paquin has only maybe 3 lines of dialog in the movie, and is played by a different actress as a child, but that character is always looking at Frank, suspicious, almost like an angel watching as her dad digs his moral grave. She’s a felt presence more than a character who engages in the action.
But this begs a question that comes up in me from time to time: Why do we care about the things bad people do in movies? Scorsese has made a career of exploring the high and low in humanity, the desperate reach up towards God, the struggle of faith, the search for love and inner peace, and also made movies about the dark thoughts inside our minds, the self destructive behaviors we may or may not be aware of. Scorsese has also made, even as he and I both bristle at him being called a “mob movie director”, movies about terribly angry gangsters whose lives are filled with the constant threat of violence, almost as a specter always following them around waiting to explode at a moments notice. Scorsese, especially alongside his legendary collaborator in editor Thelma Schoonmaker, makes these violent excursions into propulsive entertainment in a really crowd pleasing way and I’m honestly not sure why we’re compelled by it. I am compelled, but I’m not sure why.
This is all pretty well trodden ground in movies, and by Scorsese in particular. What is here that wasn’t already in Casino or Goodfellas as far as theme, character, and even plot? Sure Scorsese hasn’t ever made a movie about Jimmy Hoffa, but the structure and the characters are all mob archetypes and Hoffa is no different.
What does this movie say? Scorsese got in a lot of hot water recently for disparaging Marvel and superhero movies as being closer to theme park rides and “not cinema.” There has been a whole debate about this issue, and I don’t care to rehash it here too much other than to say that Scorsese said those movies don’t really surprise us. They don’t have any revelations for us, or teach us anything, and are essentially remakes of each other. Obviously he’s wrong about all of that, superhero movies are no different than the mythological stories that have captivated humans as long as humans have told stories. But if you’re going to say that about other people’s movies, you’re going to bring that scrutiny down onto your own movie and so I’ve gotta ask what revelations The Irishman has for us. Does it teach us anything? Is it assembled from elements of stories we’ve seen over and over again? No matter that I love Scorsese as a filmmaker, I come down on the side that it doesn’t really have anything to say. It doesn’t teach us anything and is mostly recycled from pieces of other movies. It’s different that we see these guys as old men grappling with the decisions they’ve made in life, struggling against old age and the changing of generations, but even that isn’t surprising or revelatory exactly. However, it’s a testament to Scorsese that he can make the movie extremely enjoyable while not surprising us.
submitted by Shagrrotten to IMDbFilmGeneral [link] [comments]

The Irishman is great but the future isn't all roses

As a potential last hurrah for 3 titans of cinema (and Joe Pesci), The Irishman is the perfect film for the 'end' of the careers of Martin Scorsese, Robert De Niro and Al Pacino. A big budget, star-studded gangster epic is the bread and butter of all three and, in that sense, The Irishman is a genuine triumph fit to stand alongside Casino and Once Upon a Time in America (albeit not Goodfellas or The Godfather). It's not a perfect film, however, and not even up there with the best of the respective trio but the art of film making on display is second to none.
When I first heard about this film I was very excited; a potential swansong for the greatest living director and two of the world's finest actors? What could go wrong? Very little, as it turns out, and perhaps my biggest complaint is that the runtime is maybe a little long at 3 hours and 29 minutes - I wasn't kidding when I said it was a gangster epic. The only other minor slight is that the digital de-aging performed on Pesci, Pacino and De Niro is sometimes a little more noticeable than I'd like but more on that later. Besides that, I don't have any other real issues.
The plot is slick and interesting; an up-and-coming mob hitman (De Niro) is assigned protection to Jimmy Hoffa (Pacino), union king of the USA, by one of the many mob bosses (Pesci) keeping the unions temporarily in check. I'm sure most of us have heard stories about Jimmy Hoffa and what might have happened to him, and I certainly don't want to spoil the many goings on of the plot, but lots of the little details from the many versions of the events surrounding Hoffa's disappearance inform the story and it's fun seeing the choices that characters make leading to the eventual 'reality' of things and how everything could probably have been avoided - at least as far as the film is concerned.
The ensemble cast is as good as you could want but the show stoppers are, of course, De Niro, Pacino and Pesci who give a masterclass but also look to be having a lot of fun. In fact, Pacino looks to be having a bit too much fun because, in order to capture Hoffa's larger than life public persona, Pacino chews scenery like his life depends on it and at times you'd swear you were watching a Pacino impressionist rather than the actual guy. This is obviously toned down in more subdued moments but you can see how Hoffa commanded such control if he was even half as charismatic as Pacino makes him out to be.
I'm going to wrap this mini review up because I've got a bit of something else to talk about so, suffice to say, if you like Scorsese films, gangster films, any of the actors or even have a passing interest for whatever reason then watch this film because it's awesome.
Now, a little something about the digital de-aging I mentioned earlier because this is something that really worries me, especially in conjunction with other things are currently in motion in the world of cinema.
I said that the digital de-aging is a little bit noticeable at times on our three leading men. The problem, obviously, is that all three are in their late 70s and the characters they play aren't. The technology is interesting, I don't think there's any getting around that, but I fear it could lead down quite a dark path.
The first issue is that I imagine the technology is going to be hit and miss. Here, I'd say it's a hit. The actors look younger and their faces don't get lost in the uncanny valley. A big miss was, of course, Rogue One where a horribly doughy Carrie Fisher turned up as a young Princess Leia. Not only did her face look fucking awful but I honestly wasn't sure whether or not Disney had resurrected Ray Harryhausen and got him to create a Carrie puppet to put through Dynamotion.
I don't know where his digital de-aging technology is going to lead. I mean, could Scorsese have chosen different actors to play the youngest version of the characters in The Irishman? Of course he could but he chose not to. Does that mean there aren't any actors up to the job of playing the parts? Maybe. De Niro played a young Vito Corleone in The Godfather: Part II and you'd say he's a perfect fit. The technology to make Marlon Brando didn't exist then (and let's face it, it never will) but you get the sense it wouldn't have been done even if it was possible.
I think that's a minor issue in the grand scheme of things, however. The biggest issue is what might start to happen next is already happening: the casting of dead actors. Rogue One is once again the high profile example of this, bringing Peter Cushing back from the dead and, ironically, making him look better than the Carrie puppet despite being deceased for the best part of 22 years. There was also fairly recent news that James Dean, dead for some 64 years, has been cast in a new Vietnam war Drama called Finding Jack. I'm not the only one horrified by this, of course, and there's been fairly widespread condemnation of the practice (though not directed at Rogue One for some reason) and hopefully this will dissuade people from trying again but it won't, not really.
The kickback against Finding Jack might stop another attempt for a few years but it'll be back, the technology practically demands it. And that's probably the world we're going to live in, if indeed we're not already living in it. Franchises are never allowed to die so why should their stars? The allure of the current crop obviously isn't strong enough but cast a long dead, genuine A-lister and people will line up out the door, for sheer curiosity's sake if nothing else. Then it'll be the norm and nobody will even notice when Star Wars 18 releases and Harrison Ford's corpse is dug up to be 3D scanned so he can be a force ghost.
Maybe SquareSoft had the right idea with digital actors. I mean, Aki Ross was awful but at least they didn't need to perform necromancy to create her...
submitted by Hail-Dixon to TheSquad2 [link] [comments]

The Irishman

For any viewer with doubts, Martin Scorsese's cinematic format still works 30 years later. The 30 is evident from the obvious comparison of "The Irishmas" with his other mafia films, 1990's "Goodfellas" and 1995's "Casino", whose "Irishman" could very well be a sequel, thus forming a informal organized crime film trilogy. As IMDb put it, Scorsese has made his MCU, the Mobster Cinematic Universe.
Here at CineVibesGreece we find it funny that Martin Scorsese had to beg various production companies to finance this film, even collecting many nos, most notably from Paramount Pictures. Finally, and fortunately, it was Netflix who did not hesitate to invest in the highly successful recipe of Scorsese + De Niro + Pesci = great mafia movie.
Let's first say that the movie is not an original script influenced simply by real events. It is a fairly faithful rendition of former Detective Charles Brandt's book "I Heard You Paint Houses".
And at this point let's get a little into the context. As in Q. Tarantino's recent "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood", in which the whole film leads and ends on a specific day of the real, past, world (the murders in Polanski's estate in 1969), here also the underlying fact that is the highlight of the film is the shadowy events of Jimmy Hoffa's disappearance. The latter is one of the most famous faces in the US who have disappeared, and to this day the scenarios give and take about what may have gone down. Although nothing has been officially proven since his disappearance on July 30, 1975, it is widely accepted that he was murdered by the Mafia. The fact that his body is nowhere to be found, and now all hope of finding it has been virtually extinguished, has left the field open to various writers to support their theory but also to various hitmen to claim responsibility.
BUT WHO'S THE "IRISHMAN"?
Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro), aka the "Irishman", from a young truck driver in the 1950s became involved, at first somewhat reluctantly, but later with all his might, at the actions of the Italian mafia in Pennsylvania. His mentor was the notorious Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci), for whom and his associates Frank became their johnny on the spot. But because we are talking about mafia business, most of these businesses are about destroying a current or potential opponent. So Sheeran comes into contact with the president of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino), a person who holds excessive political and economic power while at the same time being extremely fond of drivers, forging a friendly relationship with him. He becomes a bodyguard and a trusted advisor. So when Hoffa tries to regain his old influence after a period of recession, the gap between him and the Mafia has become so big that Bufalino makes Sheeran "an offer he can't refuse", forcing him to get rid of Hoffa. Recall that Hofa's assassination by Sheeran, as depicted in the film, is based solely on the claims of the author Ch. Brandt, based on a claimed Sheeran confession.
THE HITMAN LIFE AND ITS REPERCUSSIONS
Although we were more impressed by Pesci's performance (who perfectly conveys Buffalino's calm and measured power), the film is wholly owned by De Niro. The values ​​of Frank Sheeran's almost unchanging character are given to us in several clever ways in the film. He is a war veteran with no hesitation for committing war crimes. Seeing him coldly killing war prisoners makes speaks for his lack of emotion in the rest of the film. Sheeran's only remorseful moment is the phone call to Hoffa's wife, telling her not to lose hope in finding her husband, who he himself shot shortly before. Not even the critical look of his daughter, especially close to Hoffa, who seems to know, doesn't affect him. Sheeran manages to survive, because he keeps his friends close, but his enemies and his friends' enemies even closer.
Scorsese, not in directing but in storytelling, could be described as a babbler, and anyone who supports it is probably right. Still, the claims that 45 minutes to 1 hour could have been left in the editing room are certainly grounded. But let's hear the but. Unlike "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" that ends right after escalating, Scorsese pulls and pulls and pulls the film to the end of Sheeran's life to show us the impact of this life on crime. Impact not so much on the man himself but on those around him. Sheeran seems to set the last goal of his life to build his relationship with his daughter Peggy, who has stopped talking to him. Even so, he does not try to do it for moral reasons, as the film is not moving on this axis, but based on his own peculiar code of redemption, something that is imbued with a strange view on burial instead of cremation. But as mentioned above, the film simply scraps the issues of morality, which Sheeran has lost in his youth, and his relationship with his Irish-Catholic faith.
In the end, with one of the many ways to pay tribute to "Godfather I" and other gangster classics, the film closes with the door leaving Sheeran alone, away from friends, coworkers, family and faith. Is the "Irishman", mainly because of the vast, epic (in Homeric terms) narrative and all-star cast Scorsese's magnum opus or just an overloaded and boring movie filled with cinematic dinosaurs? Or something in between?
submitted by CineVibesGreece to u/CineVibesGreece [link] [comments]

Do we really need another Martin Scorsese gangster movie?

Hi everyone
The Irishman will mark the fourth time director Martin Scorsese has made an Italian Mafia movie starring Robert De Niro in a major role. I wanted to take this opportunity to have a look at Scorsese’s gangster pictures through the years, and explore The Irishman’s relationship with the previous films. Do we really need another mafia film? What can the upcoming crime film add to Scorsese’s résumé that hasn’t already been done?
My personal hope is that The Irishman is more thought provoking than the previous 3 films. The most interesting thing for me is the 'old man/aging gangster' aspect about Frank Sheeran looking back on his life. It ties nicely with mean Streets being about lowlife degenerates, Goodfellas about middle-of-the-pack hoods, and Casino about made men. This whole thing comes full circle with the aged men looking back on their lives.
I made the below video briefly looking at the relationship between the 3 main gangster movies that Scorsese has done, and what potentially The Irishman could bring to the table, validating its existence:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2qnx_S0MTQ
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts and criticisms.
If you prefer to read instead of watching the video, I wrote it up here:
It must say something about how good Martin Scorsese’s mafia movies are when this director of over 25 feature length films is often only remembered by some as a director of mob flicks. In reality he has only made 3, with one more on the way – The Irishman. I wanted to have a look at the upcoming picture, and see how it could relate to Scorsese’s crime resume, and what, if anything, it could add to a group of movies that already have said so much.
In 1973, up and coming director Scorsese cemented himself as someone to watch with the visceral and fierce crime film Mean Streets, about a duo of hoodlums growing up in Little Italy, where Scorsese himself lived his youth in. What we saw on screen had an improvisational feel to it, like all the mundane conversations, date nights and bar fights were really happening, and we just happened to be there. But the chaos was being puppeteer by a future master, suggested by the way this film was shot and edited. Rock n Roll, long takes, ultraviolence and whip pans were just some of the few elements, in addition to themes of machismo and catholic guilt, that would go on to be staple Scorsese trademarks. The film dealt with degenerates and scumbags, and yet they were human. In some cases they were even charismatic, their lifestyle inviting, but ultimately Scorsese would pull the plug on this romantic fantasy that was the mob way of life, and unleash chaos in the final third of the movie.
The film had a dirty feel…gritty and rough around the edges. It had a feel of something trying to burst out and move away from the piss-stained and littered sidewalks, trying to be something different and to stand out, much like the main character and the man behind the camera. Scorsese had poured personal dilemmas and his own internal conflicts into this movie, and it been suggested that we could see the main character as Scorsese himself in his earlier days. Something interesting to note was the movie’s lack of plot. If you had to explain what happens in the movie in a couple of sentences, what would you say? It’s difficult. Scorsese has said that he does not pay a great deal of attention to plot, in fact he claims The Departed made in 2006 is the first movie he ever made with a plot. Rather his attention is fixated on character. And Mean Streets, despite being directed by a no name starring no names on a shoe string budget, has great characters. Characters that feel real. Characters who don’t move or act for the sake of the plot or sequences of events, but rather their emotions and interactions are the centrepiece of the film, a core element without which Mean Streets doesn’t exist. With this movie, it isn’t ‘such and such happens’, then ‘such and such happens’ and because ‘such and such happens’ ‘such and such happens’. Cause and effect is thrown out the window, replaced with an emphasis on what is said, what isn’t said, what is meant, what is this character feeling, how is this character changing, if you put these two characters in a room together and lock the door, what will happen? When the characters are strong enough as they are in Mean Streets, who needs a plot? Let the characters take it away.
The style in which Scorsese directed Mean Streets, the beautiful marriage of music and images, coarse and jagged though admirable, was perfected by the time he revisited that world with the incredible Goodfellas. Again, the mob life feels entrancing and inviting, and again it is shown to be ruthless and ultimately not rewarding. A generation who had grown up on gangster films showcasing mobsters as operatic and tragic figures, almost samurai like, were given a slap to the face and a gun to the head with the captivating but punishing 1990 picture. Nowhere is the essence of this best summarised than Henry Hill’s chuffed explanation as to why the gangster Tommy DeVito being ‘made’ was such a great thing. The movie lures you in through a combination of great acting, a blissful soundtrack and a genuine sense of happiness for these crooks – no matter what they are, and the things they’ve done, in this moment in time we feel their joy. And then – bang. Out of nowhere Tommy is 'whacked'. There’s your gangster life. See yourself out.
Despite the obvious dangerous nature of the mob world, we can’t help but feel seduced at the lifestyle, reconstructed so brilliantly by Scorsese. When Henry Hill peers down from his windows at these mobsters, as an asthma-stricken and bedroom confined Scorsese must have once done atop the streets of Little Italy, we are right there with him, hopping along with him on this doomed fairy-tale. Henry represents us, the ever outsider, looking in on this world but never really fitting in. He’s unable, given his bloodline, but disregarding that Henry is closer to us than we are to any of the rest of the characters. He shares our bemusement when Tommy, after beating a man almost to death, is worried that he spilled blood on floor of the club owned by Henry, or when the crew of gangsters show more concern about digging a hole to throw a murdered bartender in, as opposed to actually murdering him in the first place.
Goodfellas is easier to be immersed into than Mean Streets, not just because of the improvement of the craft, but because of this character of Henry, who acts as our window into this world where bloodshed is an everyday occurrence. And like Mean Streets, though things seems to not be so bad on the whole, the veil is lifted towards the end of the film. Paranoid, tense, and anxious are just a few of the ways to describe Henry in the last half an hour of the film, and the kinetic and coked-up style the film goes in, accelerating to his inevitable downfall, and the ironic ending. Now the fairy-tale is over, he can’t stop thinking about the life, ignorant to the fact that he should be happy to be alive, not spend his time complaining about egg-noodle and ketchup.
The wiseguys in this film are of a different calibre to Mean Streets, a step up. Where those guys were merely hoodlums, street thugs with dead end prospects, the characters in Goodfellas are a step up. They are the money earners, the guys sticking their head out of the water trying to avoid jail time, a bullet to the head, in the hope of being made and officially recognised as part of a crime syndicate. What about those who are actually in a crime syndicate then?
Enter Casino. These guys were certified Mafioso. The bosses. Pretty much as high as you could go, the very people who would be in charge of the level of mobsters in Goodfellas. The income is better, the power more influential, the stakes higher…but the mistakes made by those in the film are just as prevalent as the low level thugs of the previous films, and in the end it topples an entire empire. The technique and style that was used for Casino was very similar to Scorsese’s 1990 Oscar nominated film, which drew criticism from critics at the time, claiming the film was basically Goodfellas in Las Vegas. With that in mind, I think the film was quite symbolic in the sense that some of his favorite themes, mainly greed, are elevated and bought to the forefront. Henry is touching the waters in Goodfellas, sometimes just trying to stay alive, keep his sate constant, but here the primary characters much like Scorsese himself are indulging in their wants to the fullest. Scorsese was at the height of his power here, and it’s fitting that he makes a movie about the mob at their highest peak too. If the question in goodfellas is why would someone want to join the mob, and how does one do so, then the question in Casino is what happens once you’ve made it, and how on earth do you mess something like that up?
Scorsese said about Casino that it is “essentially having no plot, it’s all about character”, another link to the previous 2 movies. Though Goodfellas is almost unanimously touted as the better film, Casino is not to be dismissed. In fact it touches on things that its predecessor does not. As stated the theme of greed is front and centre, and even arguably the greed of the film-makers and studios for entering this world again after only 5 years. There’s something about the film the screams excess, indulgence and in relation to the development of the characters’ lives, the false hope, the dangling bait that is the American dream. Yes, I always felt that Casino had a tragic element to it. It’s difficult to put the finger on what exactly gets me to feel this way – perhaps it’s the church choir the movie’s opening titles are accompanied with, perhaps its seeing these characters waste away such an amazing gift in life as effortlessly as they received it in the first place, or perhaps it’s just the fact that the mob life, on screen at least, always seems to be accompanied by a sense of tragedy full stop. Crime and cinema has always been fascinatingly linked, going back to what was one of the first narrative films ever made with The Great Train Robbery, which is homage at the end of Goodfellas. What is it about these characters, this way of live that is so inviting, attractive and appealing? I’m in no way educated enough to properly articulate just what appeals to me about these kind of films, but perhaps it is this screen, this camera, this barrier which separates us from the violence and death, giving us peace of mind and allowing us to be entertained, to enter a world of crime without consequences for ourselves, a bit like how going on a rollercoaster ride is like experiencing the thrill of a car crash without the danger, or watching a serial killer movie for the excitement without the fear of death that would accompany actually being stalked.
Either way, what is ultimately tragic, for me at least, is that Casino was the last of the great American crime movies. Yes there were some good ones that came after, like Donnie Brasco or American Gangster, but nothing quite touched the level of Casino. Scorsese never made a film as good as, De Niro or Pesci never made a film as good as. The genre came to an abrupt close, with most modern crime films like Gangster Squad coming and going without any real significance. With mainstream movies adjusting to become politically correct, it doesn’t seem the gangster genre is even welcome on the big screen anymore.
This is why The Irishman is so important to me. It’s another film, despite the cast and director, that never really got to the big screen, instead being produced by the streaming service Netflix. But this film, for me, will act as the curtain closer, the swansong of a genre that didn’t really get one before it died. It becomes even more perfect that the golden generation of De Niro, Pesci and Keitel will return, and Al Pacino and Marty will work together for the first time. The old guard will all slip back into Mafioso roles, whilst newcomer Pacino will instead play the outside Jimmy Hoffa, a fitting placement given his detachment to Scorsese compared to the rest of the cast.
It’s a movie that will hopefully be the most mature and though provoking of the four films, focusing on the days after the heyday. What happened to Charlie after the attack on him and his friend Johnny Boy at the end of Mean Streets? What happened after Henry closed the door of his cheap home off a construction site in the middle of nowhere at the end of Goodfellas. Those periods in the men’s lives were never explored, but here with the life of Frank Sheeran we will take a trip down memory lane with him through the highs and lows. But after the business successes and the flourishing mob connections, eventually everyone he would come to know such as Russell Buffalino and Angelo Bruno would die, and we’d be left with a frail old man looking back on his life, a life in which he is supposed to have murdered over 2 dozen people. This, surely, will be where the heart of Scorsese’s film will be. Sheeran’s real life confession was prompted by a wish for attornment for his sins, which harks back to our protagonist Charlie in Mean Streets, and his juggling of his religious dilemma and his criminal lifestyle. We had the lowlife thugs, we had the middle of the park hoods, we had the bosses of bosses, and now we have the film centred on aging, elderly gangsters, past their primes looking back at the glory days of their zeniths. It’s only fitting then, that a selection of actors and a director known for these kind of movies will portray these characters, all of whom which are also past their prime and thus Scorsese’s gangster resume comes full circle.
submitted by The_Social_Introvert to TrueFilm [link] [comments]

Would The Departed be better or worse if it had the cast as originally envisioned?

The Departed has a pretty incredible cast, but it’s fascinating to consider how many actors were almost part of the movie before they had to leave (At least according to iMDB trivia).
The character Costigan, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, was originally meant to be played by Tom Cruise.
The character Sullivan, played by Matt Damon, was originally meant to be played by Brad Pitt.
The character Costello, played by Jack Nicholson, was originally meant to be played by Al Pacino.
The character Dignam, played by Mark Wahlberg, was originally meant to be played by Ray Liotta.
The character Queenan, played by Michael Sheen, was originally meant to be played by Robert De Niro.
The character Ellerby, played by Alec Baldwin, was originally meant to be played by Mel Gibson.
Again, all of this information comes from iMDB trivia. I can’t remember why Cruise and Pitt dropped out, though Pitt continued as a producer on the movie. Pacino turned down the role of Costello, even though he was Scorsese’s first choice. I believe Liotta had some sort of scheduling conflict, De Niro dropped out to work on The Good Shepherd, and Gibson dropped out to work on Apocalypto.
I truly can’t decide if it would have been better or worse with that cast. I feel like DiCaprio and Damon both did such excellent work, and I certainly don’t know if I can see Cruise as the strung-out, anxiety-ridden Costigan. However, I think Pitt may have been equally as strong as Damon, if not even better. I love Nicholson so much in this role, and I truly don’t believe Pacino, despite his legendary status, could have done as well in the role. Nicholson improvised quite a bit and added a lot to the movie, highlighting his character’s unpredictability and showing some of his truly bizarre habits. The movie would be missing some of it’s best scenes without him, so despite how much I admire Pacino, I have to say I think Nicholson was the right choice. I can’t even imagine Pacino delivering the opening monologue, or being half as creepy and intimidating as Nicholson.
Wahlberg’s performance in the movie is pretty legendary, and he was even nominated for an Oscar, so I don’t know if I feel that Liotta should have replaced him. I think Liotta would have done a great job, though, and I would have loved seeing Scorsese work again with him. I can say for sure that I absolutely would prefer De Niro to Sheen. Sheen is a fine actor, and he does well in this movie, but De Niro and Scorsese is always a recipe for success. If he was in The Departed, it might have made the distance between Casino and The Irishman seem much less prominent. Finally, I’m pretty sure Gibson would have done a better job than Baldwin, but Baldwin was phenomenal.
What do you guys think? I love The Departed, so I was wondering how you all felt. Let me know!
submitted by WhyThisIsLikeThat to movies [link] [comments]

Do we really need another Martin Scorsese gangster movie?

Hi everyone
The Irishman will mark the fourth time director Martin Scorsese has made an Italian Mafia movie starring Robert De Niro in a major role. I wanted to take this opportunity to have a look at Scorsese’s gangster pictures through the years, and explore The Irishman’s relationship with the previous films. Do we really need another mafia film? What can the upcoming crime film add to Scorsese’s résumé that hasn’t already been done?
My personal hope is that The Irishman is more thought provoking than the previous 3 films. The most interesting thing for me is the 'old man/aging gangster' aspect about Frank Sheeran looking back on his life. It ties nicely with mean Streets being about lowlife degenerates, Goodfellas about middle-of-the-pack hoods, and Casino about made men. This whole thing comes full circle with the aged men looking back on their lives.
I made the below video briefly looking at the relationship between the 3 main gangster movies that Scorsese has done, and what potentially The Irishman could bring to the table, validating its existence:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2qnx_S0MTQ
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts and criticisms.
If you prefer to read instead of watching the video, I wrote it up here:
It must say something about how good Martin Scorsese’s mafia movies are when this director of over 25 feature length films is often only remembered by some as a director of mob flicks. In reality he has only made 3, with one more on the way – The Irishman. I wanted to have a look at the upcoming picture, and see how it could relate to Scorsese’s crime resume, and what, if anything, it could add to a group of movies that already have said so much.
In 1973, up and coming director Scorsese cemented himself as someone to watch with the visceral and fierce crime film Mean Streets, about a duo of hoodlums growing up in Little Italy, where Scorsese himself lived his youth in. What we saw on screen had an improvisational feel to it, like all the mundane conversations, date nights and bar fights were really happening, and we just happened to be there. But the chaos was being puppeteer by a future master, suggested by the way this film was shot and edited. Rock n Roll, long takes, ultraviolence and whip pans were just some of the few elements, in addition to themes of machismo and catholic guilt, that would go on to be staple Scorsese trademarks. The film dealt with degenerates and scumbags, and yet they were human. In some cases they were even charismatic, their lifestyle inviting, but ultimately Scorsese would pull the plug on this romantic fantasy that was the mob way of life, and unleash chaos in the final third of the movie.
The film had a dirty feel…gritty and rough around the edges. It had a feel of something trying to burst out and move away from the piss-stained and littered sidewalks, trying to be something different and to stand out, much like the main character and the man behind the camera. Scorsese had poured personal dilemmas and his own internal conflicts into this movie, and it been suggested that we could see the main character as Scorsese himself in his earlier days. Something interesting to note was the movie’s lack of plot. If you had to explain what happens in the movie in a couple of sentences, what would you say? It’s difficult. Scorsese has said that he does not pay a great deal of attention to plot, in fact he claims The Departed made in 2006 is the first movie he ever made with a plot. Rather his attention is fixated on character. And Mean Streets, despite being directed by a no name starring no names on a shoe string budget, has great characters. Characters that feel real. Characters who don’t move or act for the sake of the plot or sequences of events, but rather their emotions and interactions are the centrepiece of the film, a core element without which Mean Streets doesn’t exist. With this movie, it isn’t ‘such and such happens’, then ‘such and such happens’ and because ‘such and such happens’ ‘such and such happens’. Cause and effect is thrown out the window, replaced with an emphasis on what is said, what isn’t said, what is meant, what is this character feeling, how is this character changing, if you put these two characters in a room together and lock the door, what will happen? When the characters are strong enough as they are in Mean Streets, who needs a plot? Let the characters take it away.
The style in which Scorsese directed Mean Streets, the beautiful marriage of music and images, coarse and jagged though admirable, was perfected by the time he revisited that world with the incredible Goodfellas. Again, the mob life feels entrancing and inviting, and again it is shown to be ruthless and ultimately not rewarding. A generation who had grown up on gangster films showcasing mobsters as operatic and tragic figures, almost samurai like, were given a slap to the face and a gun to the head with the captivating but punishing 1990 picture. Nowhere is the essence of this best summarised than Henry Hill’s chuffed explanation as to why the gangster Tommy DeVito being ‘made’ was such a great thing. The movie lures you in through a combination of great acting, a blissful soundtrack and a genuine sense of happiness for these crooks – no matter what they are, and the things they’ve done, in this moment in time we feel their joy. And then – bang. Out of nowhere Tommy is 'whacked'. There’s your gangster life. See yourself out.
Despite the obvious dangerous nature of the mob world, we can’t help but feel seduced at the lifestyle, reconstructed so brilliantly by Scorsese. When Henry Hill peers down from his windows at these mobsters, as an asthma-stricken and bedroom confined Scorsese must have once done atop the streets of Little Italy, we are right there with him, hopping along with him on this doomed fairy-tale. Henry represents us, the ever outsider, looking in on this world but never really fitting in. He’s unable, given his bloodline, but disregarding that Henry is closer to us than we are to any of the rest of the characters. He shares our bemusement when Tommy, after beating a man almost to death, is worried that he spilled blood on floor of the club owned by Henry, or when the crew of gangsters show more concern about digging a hole to throw a murdered bartender in, as opposed to actually murdering him in the first place.
Goodfellas is easier to be immersed into than Mean Streets, not just because of the improvement of the craft, but because of this character of Henry, who acts as our window into this world where bloodshed is an everyday occurrence. And like Mean Streets, though things seems to not be so bad on the whole, the veil is lifted towards the end of the film. Paranoid, tense, and anxious are just a few of the ways to describe Henry in the last half an hour of the film, and the kinetic and coked-up style the film goes in, accelerating to his inevitable downfall, and the ironic ending. Now the fairy-tale is over, he can’t stop thinking about the life, ignorant to the fact that he should be happy to be alive, not spend his time complaining about egg-noodle and ketchup.
The wiseguys in this film are of a different calibre to Mean Streets, a step up. Where those guys were merely hoodlums, street thugs with dead end prospects, the characters in Goodfellas are a step up. They are the money earners, the guys sticking their head out of the water trying to avoid jail time, a bullet to the head, in the hope of being made and officially recognised as part of a crime syndicate. What about those who are actually in a crime syndicate then?
Enter Casino. These guys were certified Mafioso. The bosses. Pretty much as high as you could go, the very people who would be in charge of the level of mobsters in Goodfellas. The income is better, the power more influential, the stakes higher…but the mistakes made by those in the film are just as prevalent as the low level thugs of the previous films, and in the end it topples an entire empire. The technique and style that was used for Casino was very similar to Scorsese’s 1990 Oscar nominated film, which drew criticism from critics at the time, claiming the film was basically Goodfellas in Las Vegas. With that in mind, I think the film was quite symbolic in the sense that some of his favorite themes, mainly greed, are elevated and bought to the forefront. Henry is touching the waters in Goodfellas, sometimes just trying to stay alive, keep his sate constant, but here the primary characters much like Scorsese himself are indulging in their wants to the fullest. Scorsese was at the height of his power here, and it’s fitting that he makes a movie about the mob at their highest peak too. If the question in goodfellas is why would someone want to join the mob, and how does one do so, then the question in Casino is what happens once you’ve made it, and how on earth do you mess something like that up?
Scorsese said about Casino that it is “essentially having no plot, it’s all about character”, another link to the previous 2 movies. Though Goodfellas is almost unanimously touted as the better film, Casino is not to be dismissed. In fact it touches on things that its predecessor does not. As stated the theme of greed is front and centre, and even arguably the greed of the film-makers and studios for entering this world again after only 5 years. There’s something about the film the screams excess, indulgence and in relation to the development of the characters’ lives, the false hope, the dangling bait that is the American dream. Yes, I always felt that Casino had a tragic element to it. It’s difficult to put the finger on what exactly gets me to feel this way – perhaps it’s the church choir the movie’s opening titles are accompanied with, perhaps its seeing these characters waste away such an amazing gift in life as effortlessly as they received it in the first place, or perhaps it’s just the fact that the mob life, on screen at least, always seems to be accompanied by a sense of tragedy full stop. Crime and cinema has always been fascinatingly linked, going back to what was one of the first narrative films ever made with The Great Train Robbery, which is homage at the end of Goodfellas. What is it about these characters, this way of live that is so inviting, attractive and appealing? I’m in no way educated enough to properly articulate just what appeals to me about these kind of films, but perhaps it is this screen, this camera, this barrier which separates us from the violence and death, giving us peace of mind and allowing us to be entertained, to enter a world of crime without consequences for ourselves, a bit like how going on a rollercoaster ride is like experiencing the thrill of a car crash without the danger, or watching a serial killer movie for the excitement without the fear of death that would accompany actually being stalked.
Either way, what is ultimately tragic, for me at least, is that Casino was the last of the great American crime movies. Yes there were some good ones that came after, like Donnie Brasco or American Gangster, but nothing quite touched the level of Casino. Scorsese never made a film as good as, De Niro or Pesci never made a film as good as. The genre came to an abrupt close, with most modern crime films like Gangster Squad coming and going without any real significance. With mainstream movies adjusting to become politically correct, it doesn’t seem the gangster genre is even welcome on the big screen anymore.
This is why The Irishman is so important to me. It’s another film, despite the cast and director, that never really got to the big screen, instead being produced by the streaming service Netflix. But this film, for me, will act as the curtain closer, the swansong of a genre that didn’t really get one before it died. It becomes even more perfect that the golden generation of De Niro, Pesci and Keitel will return, and Al Pacino and Marty will work together for the first time. The old guard will all slip back into Mafioso roles, whilst newcomer Pacino will instead play the outside Jimmy Hoffa, a fitting placement given his detachment to Scorsese compared to the rest of the cast.
It’s a movie that will hopefully be the most mature and though provoking of the four films, focusing on the days after the heyday. What happened to Charlie after the attack on him and his friend Johnny Boy at the end of Mean Streets? What happened after Henry closed the door of his cheap home off a construction site in the middle of nowhere at the end of Goodfellas. Those periods in the men’s lives were never explored, but here with the life of Frank Sheeran we will take a trip down memory lane with him through the highs and lows. But after the business successes and the flourishing mob connections, eventually everyone he would come to know such as Russell Buffalino and Angelo Bruno would die, and we’d be left with a frail old man looking back on his life, a life in which he is supposed to have murdered over 2 dozen people. This, surely, will be where the heart of Scorsese’s film will be. Sheeran’s real life confession was prompted by a wish for attornment for his sins, which harks back to our protagonist Charlie in Mean Streets, and his juggling of his religious dilemma and his criminal lifestyle. We had the lowlife thugs, we had the middle of the park hoods, we had the bosses of bosses, and now we have the film centred on aging, elderly gangsters, past their primes looking back at the glory days of their zeniths. It’s only fitting then, that a selection of actors and a director known for these kind of movies will portray these characters, all of whom which are also past their prime and thus Scorsese’s gangster resume comes full circle.
submitted by The_Social_Introvert to flicks [link] [comments]

casino robert de niro cast video

Musique film - Casino 1995 ( Robert De Niro & Sharon Stone ... CASINO Blueberry Muffin Scene - YouTube Casinò - Qui non si scherza... - Robert De Niro - YouTube Joe Pesci and Roberto De Niro greatest Scene Ever - YouTube Casino Security by Robert De Niro - YouTube The Godfather Robert De Niro - YouTube Casino  Casino Official Trailer #1 - Robert De Niro Movie (1995 ... Sharon Stone On Working With Robert DeNiro - YouTube

Robert de Niro als Mafioso-Pate, der ein Spielcasino in den goldenen 1960er/1970er-Jahren leitet: Allein schon deshalb lohnt ich dieser Film, denn es ist eine Paraderolle. Und die geschilderten Ereignisse orientieren sich an wahren Begebenheiten, was einen Blick hinter die Kulissen des damaligen Las Vegas ermöglicht. Casino (1995) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. Directed by Martin Scorsese. With Robert De Niro, Sharon Stone, Joe Pesci, James Woods. A tale of greed, deception, money, power, and murder occur between two best friends: a mafia enforcer and a casino executive compete against each other over a gambling empire, and over a fast-living and fast-loving socialite.

casino robert de niro cast top

[index] [2063] [8921] [5804] [2104] [2870] [9909] [3427] [6075] [941] [6967]

Musique film - Casino 1995 ( Robert De Niro & Sharon Stone ...

The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather: Part II (1974) were re-edited together in chronological, The early life and career of Vito Corleone in 1920s New York... Casino. Stream now on Peacock. https://www.peacocktv.com?cid=20200101evergreenownyt002&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=owned_onlinevideo_brandawareness_descrip... About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators ... Actress Sharon Stone talks about her role in Martin Scorsese's Casino and accomplishing her dream of working with Robert DeNiro. Casinò Di Martin ScorzeseConRobert DeNiro Joe Pesci A great clip that very simply describes how security works in a Casino Subscribe to TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/sxaw6hSubscribe to COMING SOON: http://bit.ly/H2vZUnSubscribe to CLASSIC TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u43jDeLike us on FACEB... Comedy gold from movie Casino(1995) In this scene, the head of the Casino, played by Robert De Niro, gets distracted during a business meeting with one of his associates by noticing that their ... In early-1970s Las Vegas, low-level mobster Sam "Ace" Rothstein (Robert De Niro) gets tapped by his bosses to head the Tangiers Casino. At first, he's a grea...

casino robert de niro cast

Copyright © 2024 top.playrealmoneygametop.xyz